XIN.TO vs. XQQ.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XIN.TO) and iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XQQ.TO).
XIN.TO and XQQ.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XIN.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to CAD Index. It was launched on Sep 6, 2001. XQQ.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Market TR CAD. It was launched on May 3, 2011. Both XIN.TO and XQQ.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XIN.TO or XQQ.TO.
Key characteristics
| XIN.TO | XQQ.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 10.84% | 15.02% |
| 1Y Return | 14.52% | 26.50% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 7.98% | 6.05% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 8.93% | 17.99% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 7.35% | 15.96% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.27 | 1.50 |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.86% | 17.81% |
| Max Drawdown | -58.56% | -100.00% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.57% | -99.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between XIN.TO and XQQ.TO is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XIN.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XIN.TO achieves a 10.84% return, which is significantly lower than XQQ.TO's 15.02% return. Over the past 10 years, XIN.TO has underperformed XQQ.TO with an annualized return of 7.35%, while XQQ.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.96% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XIN.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XIN.TO has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than XQQ.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XIN.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XIN.TO) and iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XQQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XIN.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Dividend Comparison
XIN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, more than XQQ.TO's 0.32% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XIN.TO iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 2.46% | 2.51% | 2.18% | 2.65% | 1.81% | 2.58% | 2.85% | 2.16% | 2.41% | 2.32% | 2.83% | 2.17% |
XQQ.TO iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 0.32% | 0.31% | 0.43% | 0.17% | 0.26% | 0.46% | 0.52% | 0.53% | 0.76% | 0.62% | 1.30% | 1.10% |
Drawdowns
XIN.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XIN.TO drawdown since its inception was -58.56%, smaller than the maximum XQQ.TO drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIN.TO and XQQ.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XIN.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XIN.TO) is 4.62%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XQQ.TO) has a volatility of 7.02%. This indicates that XIN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XQQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.