XIC.TO vs. FHLC
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO) and Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC).
XIC.TO and FHLC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XIC.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Canada GR CAD. It was launched on Feb 16, 2001. FHLC is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Health Care Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2013. Both XIC.TO and FHLC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XIC.TO or FHLC.
Key characteristics
| XIC.TO | FHLC | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 8.33% | 6.85% |
| 1Y Return | 14.26% | 12.29% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 7.57% | 5.40% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 9.55% | 11.53% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 7.67% | 11.26% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.29 | 1.11 |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.12% | 10.82% |
| Max Drawdown | -100.00% | -28.76% |
| Current Drawdown | -99.99% | -1.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between XIC.TO and FHLC is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
XIC.TO vs. FHLC - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XIC.TO achieves a 8.33% return, which is significantly higher than FHLC's 6.85% return. Over the past 10 years, XIC.TO has underperformed FHLC with an annualized return of 7.67%, while FHLC has yielded a comparatively higher 11.26% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XIC.TO vs. FHLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
XIC.TO has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than FHLC's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XIC.TO vs. FHLC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO) and Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XIC.TO vs. FHLC - Dividend Comparison
XIC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, more than FHLC's 1.32% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XIC.TO iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF | 2.74% | 2.96% | 3.10% | 2.43% | 2.99% | 2.97% | 3.15% | 2.45% | 2.68% | 3.17% | 3.96% | 2.64% |
FHLC Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF | 1.32% | 1.40% | 1.30% | 1.16% | 1.45% | 1.18% | 2.13% | 1.37% | 1.39% | 2.06% | 1.03% | 0.20% |
Drawdowns
XIC.TO vs. FHLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XIC.TO drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than FHLC's maximum drawdown of -28.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIC.TO and FHLC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XIC.TO vs. FHLC - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.42% compared to Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) at 2.57%. This indicates that XIC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.