XIC.TO vs. FHLC
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO) and Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC).
XIC.TO and FHLC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XIC.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Canada GR CAD. It was launched on Feb 16, 2001. FHLC is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Health Care Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2013. Both XIC.TO and FHLC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XIC.TO or FHLC.
Correlation
The correlation between XIC.TO and FHLC is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XIC.TO vs. FHLC - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
XIC.TO:
1.24
FHLC:
-0.24
XIC.TO:
1.67
FHLC:
-0.14
XIC.TO:
1.24
FHLC:
0.98
XIC.TO:
1.42
FHLC:
-0.18
XIC.TO:
6.34
FHLC:
-0.43
XIC.TO:
2.75%
FHLC:
6.48%
XIC.TO:
14.41%
FHLC:
15.48%
XIC.TO:
-48.21%
FHLC:
-28.76%
XIC.TO:
-0.35%
FHLC:
-12.62%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XIC.TO achieves a 4.23% return, which is significantly higher than FHLC's -1.48% return. Over the past 10 years, XIC.TO has outperformed FHLC with an annualized return of 8.53%, while FHLC has yielded a comparatively lower 7.62% annualized return.
XIC.TO
4.23%
8.37%
4.52%
17.83%
15.17%
8.53%
FHLC
-1.48%
0.42%
-9.26%
-3.74%
7.29%
7.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XIC.TO vs. FHLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
XIC.TO has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than FHLC's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XIC.TO vs. FHLC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
XIC.TO
FHLC
XIC.TO vs. FHLC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO) and Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
XIC.TO vs. FHLC - Dividend Comparison
XIC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, while FHLC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XIC.TO iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF | 2.59% | 2.64% | 2.95% | 3.10% | 2.45% | 3.03% | 3.01% | 3.19% | 2.49% | 2.72% | 3.21% | 2.59% |
FHLC Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
XIC.TO vs. FHLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XIC.TO drawdown since its inception was -48.21%, which is greater than FHLC's maximum drawdown of -28.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIC.TO and FHLC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
XIC.TO vs. FHLC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO) is 3.09%, while Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) has a volatility of 6.65%. This indicates that XIC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...