PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XHYH vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XHYH vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx US High Yield Healthcare Sector ETF (XHYH) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XHYH achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 30.49% return.


XHYH

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.35%
YTD
1.24%
6M
1.15%
1Y
7.28%
3Y*
9.88%
5Y*
10Y*

VGT

1D
-0.88%
1M
14.99%
YTD
30.49%
6M
28.76%
1Y
58.31%
3Y*
33.33%
5Y*
22.01%
10Y*
25.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XHYH vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XHYH
BondBloxx US High Yield Healthcare Sector ETF
1.24%10.30%9.65%12.93%-12.71%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
30.49%21.77%29.30%52.66%-20.10%

Correlation

The correlation between XHYH and VGT is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2022

0.56

Over the past year, the correlation between XHYH and VGT has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XHYH vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XHYH
VGT

Healthcare

64.7%
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

3.8%
0.1%

Technology

0.3%
98.5%

Basic Materials

-

0.0%

Communication Services

-

0.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.3%

Financial Services

-

0.5%

Industrials

-

0.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

XHYH
64.7%
VGT
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

XHYH
3.8%
VGT
0.1%

Technology

XHYH
0.3%
VGT
98.5%

Basic Materials

XHYH

-

VGT
0.0%

Communication Services

XHYH

-

VGT
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

XHYH

-

VGT

-

Energy

XHYH

-

VGT
0.3%

Financial Services

XHYH

-

VGT
0.5%

Industrials

XHYH

-

VGT
0.4%

Real Estate

XHYH

-

VGT

-

Utilities

XHYH

-

VGT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XHYH vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XHYH
XHYH Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
XHYH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XHYH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
XHYH Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
XHYH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
XHYH Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XHYH vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx US High Yield Healthcare Sector ETF (XHYH) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XHYHVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.46

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

3.57

-0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.30

11.41

+0.90

XHYH vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XHYH Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XHYH and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XHYHVGTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

2.85

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.68

-0.15

Drawdowns

XHYH vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XHYH drawdown since its inception was -17.84%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHYH and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XHYHVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.84%

-54.63%

+36.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.62%

-16.40%

+13.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.09%

-27.23%

+22.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-2.35%

+1.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.62%

-7.95%

+3.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.66%

5.13%

-4.47%

Volatility

XHYH vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BondBloxx US High Yield Healthcare Sector ETF (XHYH) is 0.87%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 6.51%. This indicates that XHYH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XHYHVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.87%

6.51%

-5.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.15%

16.09%

-12.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.32%

20.55%

-16.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.55%

25.17%

-16.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.55%

24.60%

-16.05%

XHYH vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XHYH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

XHYH vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

XHYH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.58%, more than VGT's 0.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.31%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%
XHYH
BondBloxx US High Yield Healthcare Sector ETF
6.58%6.95%6.95%7.73%6.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XHYH and VGT have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (6.51%) compared to XHYH (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XHYH dropped -17.84% vs VGT's -54.63%.

On 3-year performance, VGT leads with 33.33% vs 9.88% for XHYH. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, XHYH has been the lower-risk option at 0.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VGT has performed better with a 33.33% return vs 9.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XHYH.

XHYH has the higher dividend yield at 6.58%, compared with 0.31% for VGT.

XHYH is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while VGT is Technology Equities. XHYH tracks ICE Diversified US Cash Pay High Yield Healthcare Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XHYH and 0.09% for VGT.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XHYH and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer