XHLF vs. JPST
Compare and contrast key facts about BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) and JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST).
XHLF and JPST are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XHLF is a passively managed fund by BondBloxx that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Treasury 6 Month Duration Index. It was launched on Sep 13, 2022. JPST is an actively managed fund by JPMorgan. It was launched on May 17, 2017.
Performance
XHLF vs. JPST - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XHLF vs. JPST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XHLF BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF | 0.78% | 4.21% | 5.04% | 4.90% | 0.96% |
JPST JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF | 0.71% | 4.99% | 5.58% | 5.13% | 1.11% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XHLF achieves a 0.78% return, which is significantly higher than JPST's 0.71% return.
XHLF
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 0.78%
- 6M
- 1.76%
- 1Y
- 3.95%
- 3Y*
- 4.61%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JPST
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.06%
- YTD
- 0.71%
- 6M
- 1.84%
- 1Y
- 4.39%
- 3Y*
- 5.12%
- 5Y*
- 3.50%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XHLF vs. JPST - Expense Ratio Comparison
XHLF has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than JPST's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
XHLF vs. JPST — Risk / Return Rank
XHLF
JPST
XHLF vs. JPST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) and JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XHLF | JPST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 12.09 | 7.23 | +4.85 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 39.75 | 13.86 | +25.89 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 9.67 | 3.40 | +6.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 99.61 | 14.88 | +84.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 605.40 | 94.20 | +511.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XHLF | JPST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.09 | 7.23 | +4.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 6.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 10.74 | 3.16 | +7.58 |
Correlation
The correlation between XHLF and JPST is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
XHLF vs. JPST - Dividend Comparison
XHLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, less than JPST's 4.34% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XHLF BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF | 3.88% | 3.98% | 4.96% | 4.50% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JPST JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF | 4.34% | 4.43% | 5.16% | 4.79% | 1.83% | 0.73% | 1.43% | 2.69% | 2.07% | 0.96% |
Drawdowns
XHLF vs. JPST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XHLF drawdown since its inception was -0.11%, smaller than the maximum JPST drawdown of -3.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHLF and JPST.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XHLF | JPST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.11% | -3.28% | +3.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.04% | -0.30% | +0.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -0.08% | +0.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | 0.05% | -0.04% |
Volatility
XHLF vs. JPST - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) is 0.09%, while JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST) has a volatility of 0.22%. This indicates that XHLF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JPST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XHLF | JPST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.09% | 0.22% | -0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.21% | 0.35% | -0.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33% | 0.61% | -0.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.42% | 0.57% | -0.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.42% | 0.94% | -0.52% |