XHLF vs. JIGB

In the year-to-date period, XHLF achieves a 1.45% return, which is significantly higher than JIGB's 1.05% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

XHLF has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than JIGB's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) and JPMorgan Corporate Bond Research Enhanced ETF (JIGB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current XHLF Sharpe Ratio is 11.89, which is higher than the JIGB Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XHLF and JIGB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

XHLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, less than JIGB's 5.15% yield.

The maximum XHLF drawdown since its inception was -0.11%, smaller than the maximum JIGB drawdown of -22.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHLF and JIGB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) is 0.10%, while JPMorgan Corporate Bond Research Enhanced ETF (JIGB) has a volatility of 2.12%. This indicates that XHLF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JIGB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.