XHC.TO vs. XEQT.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XHC.TO) and iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO).
XHC.TO and XEQT.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XHC.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Gbl GR CAD. It was launched on Apr 12, 2011. XEQT.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Gbl GR CAD. It was launched on Aug 7, 2019. Both XHC.TO and XEQT.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XHC.TO or XEQT.TO.
Key characteristics
| XHC.TO | XEQT.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 9.48% | 23.68% |
| 1Y Return | 15.16% | 31.56% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 2.66% | 8.79% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 7.98% | 11.99% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.58 | 3.29 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.25 | 4.61 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.28 | 1.62 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.36 | 4.78 |
| Martin Ratio | 6.25 | 24.85 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.43% | 1.28% |
| Daily Std Dev | 9.61% | 9.64% |
| Max Drawdown | -27.28% | -29.74% |
| Current Drawdown | -6.72% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between XHC.TO and XEQT.TO is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XHC.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XHC.TO achieves a 9.48% return, which is significantly lower than XEQT.TO's 23.68% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XHC.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XHC.TO has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than XEQT.TO's 0.20% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XHC.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XHC.TO) and iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XHC.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison
XHC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, more than XEQT.TO's 1.80% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XHC.TO iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 2.21% | 2.38% | 0.84% | 0.79% | 0.93% | 1.03% | 1.63% | 1.10% | 1.58% | 2.07% | 1.00% | 1.21% |
XEQT.TO iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio | 1.80% | 2.09% | 2.14% | 1.65% | 1.68% | 1.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
XHC.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XHC.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.28%, smaller than the maximum XEQT.TO drawdown of -29.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHC.TO and XEQT.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XHC.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XHC.TO) and iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) have volatilities of 3.08% and 2.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.