XGRO.TO vs. SCHD
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio (XGRO.TO) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD).
XGRO.TO and SCHD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XGRO.TO is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Jun 21, 2007. SCHD is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. It was launched on Oct 20, 2011.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XGRO.TO or SCHD.
Key characteristics
| XGRO.TO | SCHD | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 19.26% | 17.07% |
| 1Y Return | 25.97% | 29.98% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 6.60% | 6.85% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 9.60% | 12.79% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 8.29% | 11.62% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.29 | 2.64 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.73 | 3.81 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.63 | 1.47 |
| Calmar Ratio | 5.12 | 2.92 |
| Martin Ratio | 26.50 | 14.57 |
| Ulcer Index | 0.99% | 2.04% |
| Daily Std Dev | 7.94% | 11.26% |
| Max Drawdown | -47.93% | -33.37% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.49% | -0.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between XGRO.TO and SCHD is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
XGRO.TO vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XGRO.TO achieves a 19.26% return, which is significantly higher than SCHD's 17.07% return. Over the past 10 years, XGRO.TO has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 8.29%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 11.62% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XGRO.TO vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
XGRO.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XGRO.TO vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio (XGRO.TO) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XGRO.TO vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
XGRO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, less than SCHD's 3.38% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XGRO.TO iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio | 2.05% | 2.27% | 1.89% | 1.69% | 1.98% | 2.25% | 7.56% | 2.08% | 2.70% | 2.19% | 5.71% | 1.66% |
SCHD Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF | 3.38% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% | 2.63% | 2.47% |
Drawdowns
XGRO.TO vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XGRO.TO drawdown since its inception was -47.93%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGRO.TO and SCHD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XGRO.TO vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio (XGRO.TO) is 2.61%, while Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a volatility of 3.51%. This indicates that XGRO.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.