XGD.TO vs. QQC.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF (XGD.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO).
XGD.TO and QQC.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XGD.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Gbl Gold GR CAD. It was launched on Mar 23, 2001. QQC.TO is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on May 27, 2021. Both XGD.TO and QQC.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XGD.TO or QQC.TO.
Correlation
The correlation between XGD.TO and QQC.TO is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
XGD.TO vs. QQC.TO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
XGD.TO:
0.71
QQC.TO:
2.29
XGD.TO:
1.12
QQC.TO:
3.03
XGD.TO:
1.14
QQC.TO:
1.40
XGD.TO:
0.49
QQC.TO:
3.07
XGD.TO:
2.40
QQC.TO:
11.10
XGD.TO:
8.20%
QQC.TO:
3.54%
XGD.TO:
27.67%
QQC.TO:
17.16%
XGD.TO:
-72.55%
QQC.TO:
-31.81%
XGD.TO:
-18.01%
QQC.TO:
-1.90%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XGD.TO achieves a 21.12% return, which is significantly lower than QQC.TO's 38.94% return.
XGD.TO
21.12%
-6.62%
8.00%
18.65%
7.02%
10.22%
QQC.TO
38.94%
6.43%
16.44%
39.27%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XGD.TO vs. QQC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XGD.TO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than QQC.TO's 0.20% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XGD.TO vs. QQC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF (XGD.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XGD.TO vs. QQC.TO - Dividend Comparison
XGD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, more than QQC.TO's 0.46% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XGD.TO iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF | 0.93% | 1.49% | 1.80% | 1.38% | 0.35% | 0.54% | 0.25% | 0.14% | 0.09% | 0.57% | 0.68% | 1.71% |
QQC.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged | 0.46% | 0.54% | 0.91% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
XGD.TO vs. QQC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XGD.TO drawdown since its inception was -72.55%, which is greater than QQC.TO's maximum drawdown of -31.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XGD.TO and QQC.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XGD.TO vs. QQC.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF (XGD.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.98% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO) at 5.56%. This indicates that XGD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.