XEM.TO vs. ZLB.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF (XEM.TO) and BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO).
XEM.TO and ZLB.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XEM.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar EM GR CAD. It was launched on Jun 18, 2009. ZLB.TO is an actively managed fund by BMO. It was launched on Oct 21, 2011.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XEM.TO or ZLB.TO.
Correlation
The correlation between XEM.TO and ZLB.TO is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
XEM.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
XEM.TO:
1.46
ZLB.TO:
2.30
XEM.TO:
2.13
ZLB.TO:
3.45
XEM.TO:
1.27
ZLB.TO:
1.43
XEM.TO:
0.85
ZLB.TO:
3.05
XEM.TO:
5.98
ZLB.TO:
10.01
XEM.TO:
3.21%
ZLB.TO:
1.73%
XEM.TO:
13.17%
ZLB.TO:
7.55%
XEM.TO:
-35.27%
ZLB.TO:
-33.96%
XEM.TO:
-7.74%
ZLB.TO:
-1.23%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XEM.TO achieves a 4.49% return, which is significantly higher than ZLB.TO's 2.44% return. Over the past 10 years, XEM.TO has underperformed ZLB.TO with an annualized return of 4.11%, while ZLB.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 8.97% annualized return.
XEM.TO
4.49%
3.15%
7.33%
18.65%
3.39%
4.11%
ZLB.TO
2.44%
2.98%
5.17%
15.91%
8.58%
8.97%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XEM.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XEM.TO has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than ZLB.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XEM.TO vs. ZLB.TO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
XEM.TO
ZLB.TO
XEM.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF (XEM.TO) and BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XEM.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Dividend Comparison
XEM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, less than ZLB.TO's 2.32% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XEM.TO iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF | 1.99% | 2.08% | 2.39% | 2.10% | 1.91% | 1.28% | 2.57% | 1.96% | 1.78% | 1.96% | 2.22% | 2.15% |
ZLB.TO BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF | 2.32% | 2.37% | 2.67% | 2.66% | 2.39% | 2.83% | 2.44% | 2.76% | 2.52% | 2.94% | 2.34% | 1.94% |
Drawdowns
XEM.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XEM.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.27%, roughly equal to the maximum ZLB.TO drawdown of -33.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEM.TO and ZLB.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XEM.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF (XEM.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.69% compared to BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO) at 2.53%. This indicates that XEM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZLB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.