XELA vs. BTU
XELA (Exela Technologies, Inc.) and BTU (Peabody Energy Corporation) are both stocks. XELA operates in Software - Application (Technology), while BTU operates in Thermal Coal (Energy). Over the past 5 years, XELA returned -95.17%/yr vs 30.55%/yr for BTU. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XELA vs. BTU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XELA achieves a -85.45% return, which is significantly lower than BTU's 1.93% return.
XELA
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- -85.45%
- 6M
- -97.33%
- 1Y
- -27.27%
- 3Y*
- -93.27%
- 5Y*
- -95.17%
- 10Y*
- -83.66%
BTU
- 1D
- 1.65%
- 1M
- 13.90%
- YTD
- 1.93%
- 6M
- 2.86%
- 1Y
- 132.08%
- 3Y*
- 18.57%
- 5Y*
- 30.55%
- 10Y*
- —
XELA vs. BTU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XELA Exela Technologies, Inc. | -85.45% | -99.01% | -66.96% | -79.51% | -99.53% | -29.58% | 1.79% | -89.51% | -24.47% | -48.29% |
BTU Peabody Energy Corporation | 1.93% | 44.18% | -12.80% | -7.03% | 162.36% | 317.84% | -73.57% | -67.32% | -21.62% | 27.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between XELA and BTU is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2017 | 0.08 |
Fundamentals
XELA:
-$284.40M
BTU:
$3.86B
XELA:
-$43.97M
BTU:
$318.50M
XELA:
-$20.50M
BTU:
$401.20M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XELA vs. BTU — Risk / Return Rank
XELA
BTU
XELA vs. BTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Exela Technologies, Inc. (XELA) and Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XELA | BTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | 2.24 | -2.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 26.73 | 2.78 | +23.94 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 5.37 | 1.32 | +4.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.27 | 3.27 | -3.54 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.37 | 7.92 | -8.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XELA | BTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 | 2.24 | -2.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 | 0.46 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.06 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.00 | 0.02 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
XELA vs. BTU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XELA drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum BTU drawdown of -98.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XELA and BTU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XELA | BTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -98.07% | -1.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -99.59% | -40.67% | -58.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -99.98% | -65.14% | -34.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -100.00% | -67.44% | -32.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -100.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -27.07% | -72.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -70.91% | -48.13% | -22.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 73.86% | 16.74% | +57.12% |
Volatility
XELA vs. BTU - Volatility Comparison
Exela Technologies, Inc. (XELA) has a higher volatility of 451.49% compared to Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) at 18.95%. This indicates that XELA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XELA | BTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 451.49% | 18.95% | +432.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 783.93% | 40.94% | +742.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4,287.39% | 59.43% | +4,227.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1,939.79% | 66.59% | +1,873.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1,374.83% | 77.80% | +1,297.03% |
Dividends
XELA vs. BTU - Dividend Comparison
XELA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTU Peabody Energy Corporation | 1.00% | 1.01% | 1.43% | 0.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 26.43% | 1.59% |
XELA Exela Technologies, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
XELA vs. BTU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Exela Technologies, Inc. and Peabody Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
XELA vs. BTU - Profitability Comparison
XELA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exela Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 11.21M and revenue of 39.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.3%.
BTU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Peabody Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 49.70M and revenue of 1.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 4.9%.
XELA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exela Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 806.00K and revenue of 39.62M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.0%.
BTU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Peabody Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 19.20M and revenue of 1.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.9%.
XELA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exela Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of -6.89M and revenue of 39.62M, resulting in a net margin of -17.4%.
BTU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Peabody Energy Corporation reported a net income of 10.40M and revenue of 1.02B, resulting in a net margin of 1.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
XELA and BTU have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XELA has higher volatility (451.49%) compared to BTU (18.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XELA dropped -100.00% vs BTU's -98.07%.
BTU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XELA and BTU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer