PortfoliosLab logo
XEL vs. ED
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between XEL and ED is -0.40. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

XEL vs. ED - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xcel Energy Inc. (XEL) and Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

XEL:

16.83%

ED:

27.69%

Max Drawdown

XEL:

-1.67%

ED:

-3.03%

Current Drawdown

XEL:

-1.05%

ED:

-3.03%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

XEL:

$40.73B

ED:

$38.80B

EPS

XEL:

$3.40

ED:

$5.41

PE Ratio

XEL:

20.77

ED:

19.90

PEG Ratio

XEL:

2.81

ED:

3.70

PS Ratio

XEL:

2.97

ED:

2.46

PB Ratio

XEL:

2.08

ED:

1.63

Total Revenue (TTM)

XEL:

$13.71B

ED:

$15.78B

Gross Profit (TTM)

XEL:

$4.66B

ED:

$8.87B

EBITDA (TTM)

XEL:

$5.59B

ED:

$5.66B

Returns By Period


XEL

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

ED

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

XEL vs. ED — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XEL is 9090
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XEL is 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XEL is 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XEL is 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XEL is 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XEL is 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

ED
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ED is 7474
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ED is 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ED is 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ED is 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ED is 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ED is 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

XEL vs. ED - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xcel Energy Inc. (XEL) and Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

XEL vs. ED - Dividend Comparison

XEL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, more than ED's 3.10% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
XEL
Xcel Energy Inc.
3.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ED
Consolidated Edison, Inc.
3.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

XEL vs. ED - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEL drawdown since its inception was -1.67%, smaller than the maximum ED drawdown of -3.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEL and ED. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

XEL vs. ED - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...

Financials

XEL vs. ED - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Xcel Energy Inc. and Consolidated Edison, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.50B3.00B3.50B4.00B4.50B20212022202320242025
3.91B
4.80B
(XEL) Total Revenue
(ED) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

XEL vs. ED - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Xcel Energy Inc. and Consolidated Edison, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
43.1%
54.9%
(XEL) Gross Margin
(ED) Gross Margin
XEL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Xcel Energy Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.69B and revenue of 3.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.1%.

ED - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Consolidated Edison, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.64B and revenue of 4.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.9%.

XEL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Xcel Energy Inc. reported an operating income of 677.00M and revenue of 3.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.3%.

ED - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Consolidated Edison, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.13B and revenue of 4.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.5%.

XEL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Xcel Energy Inc. reported a net income of 483.00M and revenue of 3.91B, resulting in a net margin of 12.4%.

ED - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Consolidated Edison, Inc. reported a net income of 791.00M and revenue of 4.80B, resulting in a net margin of 16.5%.