PortfoliosLab logo
XEL vs. CMS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between XEL and CMS is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

XEL vs. CMS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xcel Energy Inc. (XEL) and CMS Energy Corporation (CMS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

XEL:

1.68

CMS:

0.95

Sortino Ratio

XEL:

2.31

CMS:

1.45

Omega Ratio

XEL:

1.31

CMS:

1.18

Calmar Ratio

XEL:

1.25

CMS:

1.27

Martin Ratio

XEL:

8.07

CMS:

4.35

Ulcer Index

XEL:

4.33%

CMS:

4.17%

Daily Std Dev

XEL:

20.59%

CMS:

17.63%

Max Drawdown

XEL:

-80.64%

CMS:

-91.20%

Current Drawdown

XEL:

0.00%

CMS:

-4.64%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

XEL:

$41.75B

CMS:

$21.38B

EPS

XEL:

$3.40

CMS:

$3.38

PE Ratio

XEL:

21.29

CMS:

21.15

PEG Ratio

XEL:

2.81

CMS:

2.87

PS Ratio

XEL:

3.05

CMS:

2.75

PB Ratio

XEL:

2.08

CMS:

2.61

Total Revenue (TTM)

XEL:

$13.71B

CMS:

$7.79B

Gross Profit (TTM)

XEL:

$4.66B

CMS:

$3.05B

EBITDA (TTM)

XEL:

$5.59B

CMS:

$3.15B

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XEL having a 8.99% return and CMS slightly lower at 8.89%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XEL having a 11.11% annualized return and CMS not far behind at 10.96%.


XEL

YTD

8.99%

1M

3.21%

6M

5.95%

1Y

35.06%

5Y*

7.06%

10Y*

11.11%

CMS

YTD

8.89%

1M

-1.24%

6M

6.36%

1Y

16.54%

5Y*

8.22%

10Y*

10.96%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

XEL vs. CMS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XEL is 9090
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XEL is 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XEL is 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XEL is 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XEL is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XEL is 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

CMS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CMS is 8181
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CMS is 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CMS is 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CMS is 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CMS is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CMS is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

XEL vs. CMS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xcel Energy Inc. (XEL) and CMS Energy Corporation (CMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current XEL Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is higher than the CMS Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEL and CMS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

XEL vs. CMS - Dividend Comparison

XEL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, more than CMS's 2.96% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
XEL
Xcel Energy Inc.
3.06%2.43%3.36%2.78%2.71%2.58%2.55%3.09%2.99%3.34%3.56%3.34%
CMS
CMS Energy Corporation
2.96%3.09%3.36%2.91%2.67%2.67%2.43%2.88%2.81%2.98%3.22%3.11%

Drawdowns

XEL vs. CMS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEL drawdown since its inception was -80.64%, smaller than the maximum CMS drawdown of -91.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEL and CMS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

XEL vs. CMS - Volatility Comparison

Xcel Energy Inc. (XEL) has a higher volatility of 8.08% compared to CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) at 6.80%. This indicates that XEL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

XEL vs. CMS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Xcel Energy Inc. and CMS Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B4.00B20212022202320242025
3.91B
2.45B
(XEL) Total Revenue
(CMS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

XEL vs. CMS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Xcel Energy Inc. and CMS Energy Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%20212022202320242025
43.1%
42.7%
(XEL) Gross Margin
(CMS) Gross Margin
XEL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Xcel Energy Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.69B and revenue of 3.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.1%.

CMS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CMS Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.04B and revenue of 2.45B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.7%.

XEL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Xcel Energy Inc. reported an operating income of 677.00M and revenue of 3.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.3%.

CMS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CMS Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 494.00M and revenue of 2.45B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.2%.

XEL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Xcel Energy Inc. reported a net income of 483.00M and revenue of 3.91B, resulting in a net margin of 12.4%.

CMS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CMS Energy Corporation reported a net income of 304.00M and revenue of 2.45B, resulting in a net margin of 12.4%.