XEL vs. CMS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Xcel Energy Inc. (XEL) and CMS Energy Corporation (CMS).

Performance

XEL vs. CMS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xcel Energy Inc. (XEL) and CMS Energy Corporation (CMS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XEL vs. CMS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XEL Xcel Energy Inc.	8.35%	13.89%	12.32%	-8.67%	6.44%	4.40%	7.77%	32.37%	5.88%	21.91%
CMS CMS Energy Corporation	11.77%	8.13%	18.60%	-5.21%	0.84%	9.71%	-0.32%	30.04%	8.25%	17.03%

Fundamentals

Market Cap XEL : $47.43B CMS : $23.31B
EPS XEL : $3.44 CMS : $3.57
PE Ratio XEL : 23.11 CMS : 21.73
PS Ratio XEL : 3.18 CMS : 2.73
Total Revenue (TTM) XEL : $14.67B CMS : $8.54B
Gross Profit (TTM) XEL : $5.30B CMS : $2.35B
EBITDA (TTM) XEL : $6.19B CMS : $2.95B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEL achieves a 8.35% return, which is significantly lower than CMS's 11.77% return. Over the past 10 years, XEL has outperformed CMS with an annualized return of 9.92%, while CMS has yielded a comparatively lower 9.41% annualized return.

XEL

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: -4.00%
• YTD: 8.35%
• 6M: -0.01%
• 1Y: 15.77%
• 3Y*: 9.29%
• 5Y*: 6.86%
• 10Y*: 9.92%

CMS

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: -0.63%
• YTD: 11.77%
• 6M: 7.50%
• 1Y: 6.41%
• 3Y*: 11.62%
• 5Y*: 8.32%
• 10Y*: 9.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

XEL vs. CMS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEL

XEL Risk / Return Rank: 68
XEL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
XEL Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
XEL Omega Ratio Rank: 61
XEL Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
XEL Martin Ratio Rank: 73

CMS

CMS Risk / Return Rank: 54
CMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
CMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
CMS Omega Ratio Rank: 45
CMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
CMS Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEL vs. CMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xcel Energy Inc. (XEL) and CMS Energy Corporation (CMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XEL	CMS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.80	0.39	+0.42
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.23	0.62	+0.61
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.08	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.53	0.91	+0.62
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.81	1.70	+2.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XEL vs. CMS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEL Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is higher than the CMS Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEL and CMS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XEL	CMS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80	0.39	+0.42
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34	0.44	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	0.46	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.35	+0.06

Correlation

The correlation between XEL and CMS is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

XEL vs. CMS - Dividend Comparison

XEL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, more than CMS's 2.83% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
XEL Xcel Energy Inc.	2.90%	3.83%	2.43%	3.36%	2.78%	2.70%	2.58%	2.55%	3.09%	2.99%	3.34%	3.56%
CMS CMS Energy Corporation	2.83%	3.10%	3.09%	3.36%	3.62%	2.67%	2.67%	2.43%	2.88%	2.81%	2.98%	3.22%

Drawdowns

XEL vs. CMS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEL drawdown since its inception was -80.64%, smaller than the maximum CMS drawdown of -91.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEL and CMS.

Drawdown Indicators

	XEL	CMS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.64%	-91.20%	+10.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.50%	-8.51%	-2.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.41%	-27.56%	-6.85%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.41%	-29.55%	-4.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.63%	-0.91%	-3.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.35%	-27.45%	+16.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.60%	4.55%	+0.05%

Volatility

XEL vs. CMS - Volatility Comparison

Xcel Energy Inc. (XEL) and CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) have volatilities of 5.23% and 5.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XEL	CMS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.23%	5.46%	-0.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.72%	11.15%	+0.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.77%	16.71%	+3.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.47%	18.83%	+1.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.57%	20.65%	+0.92%

Financials

XEL vs. CMS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Xcel Energy Inc. and CMS Energy Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

XEL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Xcel Energy Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CMS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CMS Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

XEL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Xcel Energy Inc. reported an operating income of 580.00M and revenue of 3.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.3%.

CMS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CMS Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 435.00M and revenue of 2.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.5%.

XEL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Xcel Energy Inc. reported a net income of 567.00M and revenue of 3.56B, resulting in a net margin of 15.9%.

CMS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CMS Energy Corporation reported a net income of 289.00M and revenue of 2.23B, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.