XEF-U.TO vs. HXQ.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF-U.TO) and Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO).
XEF-U.TO and HXQ.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XEF-U.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE® Investable Market Index. It was launched on Oct 9, 2019. HXQ.TO is a passively managed fund by Horizons that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Apr 19, 2016. Both XEF-U.TO and HXQ.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XEF-U.TO or HXQ.TO.
Correlation
The correlation between XEF-U.TO and HXQ.TO is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
XEF-U.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
XEF-U.TO:
1.15
HXQ.TO:
1.84
XEF-U.TO:
1.81
HXQ.TO:
2.48
XEF-U.TO:
1.21
HXQ.TO:
1.32
XEF-U.TO:
1.27
HXQ.TO:
2.52
XEF-U.TO:
4.09
HXQ.TO:
8.87
XEF-U.TO:
4.66%
HXQ.TO:
3.65%
XEF-U.TO:
15.25%
HXQ.TO:
17.62%
XEF-U.TO:
-33.72%
HXQ.TO:
-31.60%
XEF-U.TO:
-1.90%
HXQ.TO:
-0.80%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XEF-U.TO achieves a 8.30% return, which is significantly higher than HXQ.TO's 3.54% return.
XEF-U.TO
8.30%
4.60%
1.61%
10.69%
11.92%
N/A
HXQ.TO
3.54%
1.11%
18.19%
32.90%
20.83%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XEF-U.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XEF-U.TO has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than HXQ.TO's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XEF-U.TO vs. HXQ.TO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
XEF-U.TO
HXQ.TO
XEF-U.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF-U.TO) and Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XEF-U.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Dividend Comparison
XEF-U.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, while HXQ.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XEF-U.TO iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF | 1.88% | 2.04% | 2.08% | 2.43% | 1.94% | 1.40% | 0.77% |
HXQ.TO Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
XEF-U.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XEF-U.TO drawdown since its inception was -33.72%, which is greater than HXQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -31.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEF-U.TO and HXQ.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XEF-U.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF-U.TO) is 3.59%, while Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO) has a volatility of 4.62%. This indicates that XEF-U.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HXQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.