XDWH.L vs. XDWT.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.L).
XDWH.L and XDWT.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XDWH.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. It was launched on Mar 4, 2016. XDWT.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Mar 9, 2016. Both XDWH.L and XDWT.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XDWH.L or XDWT.L.
Key characteristics
| XDWH.L | XDWT.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 15.97% | 21.70% |
| 1Y Return | 19.32% | 39.50% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 5.96% | 11.95% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 11.76% | 22.32% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.57 | 1.87 |
| Daily Std Dev | 36.00% | 21.08% |
| Max Drawdown | -26.24% | -35.99% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.05% | -7.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDWH.L and XDWT.L is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
XDWH.L vs. XDWT.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XDWH.L achieves a 15.97% return, which is significantly lower than XDWT.L's 21.70% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XDWH.L vs. XDWT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XDWH.L and XDWT.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XDWH.L vs. XDWT.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XDWH.L vs. XDWT.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDWH.L nor XDWT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XDWH.L vs. XDWT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDWH.L drawdown since its inception was -26.24%, smaller than the maximum XDWT.L drawdown of -35.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWH.L and XDWT.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XDWH.L vs. XDWT.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L) is 2.72%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.L) has a volatility of 7.62%. This indicates that XDWH.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.