XDWF.DE vs. ANXU.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWF.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L).
XDWF.DE and ANXU.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XDWF.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI World Financials. It was launched on Mar 4, 2016. ANXU.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. It was launched on Apr 18, 2018. Both XDWF.DE and ANXU.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XDWF.DE or ANXU.L.
Key characteristics
| XDWF.DE | ANXU.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 34.99% | 25.37% |
| 1Y Return | 47.71% | 38.05% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 12.47% | 9.93% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 12.51% | 21.36% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.57 | 2.24 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.71 | 3.01 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.74 | 1.40 |
| Calmar Ratio | 5.03 | 3.01 |
| Martin Ratio | 25.95 | 10.50 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.74% | 3.51% |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.59% | 16.47% |
| Max Drawdown | -42.06% | -35.13% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -0.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDWF.DE and ANXU.L is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
XDWF.DE vs. ANXU.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XDWF.DE achieves a 34.99% return, which is significantly higher than ANXU.L's 25.37% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XDWF.DE vs. ANXU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDWF.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ANXU.L's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XDWF.DE vs. ANXU.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWF.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XDWF.DE vs. ANXU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDWF.DE nor ANXU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XDWF.DE vs. ANXU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDWF.DE drawdown since its inception was -42.06%, which is greater than ANXU.L's maximum drawdown of -35.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWF.DE and ANXU.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XDWF.DE vs. ANXU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWF.DE) is 4.27%, while Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) has a volatility of 4.95%. This indicates that XDWF.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANXU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.