XDW0.DE vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.DE) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
XDW0.DE and SCHG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XDW0.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. It was launched on Mar 9, 2016. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009. Both XDW0.DE and SCHG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XDW0.DE or SCHG.
Key characteristics
| XDW0.DE | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 12.83% | 31.47% |
| 1Y Return | 11.14% | 43.66% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 19.23% | 10.23% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 10.90% | 20.64% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.68 | 2.65 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.99 | 3.41 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.13 | 1.48 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.80 | 3.65 |
| Martin Ratio | 1.89 | 14.55 |
| Ulcer Index | 6.17% | 3.10% |
| Daily Std Dev | 17.16% | 17.01% |
| Max Drawdown | -61.44% | -34.59% |
| Current Drawdown | -4.77% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDW0.DE and SCHG is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
XDW0.DE vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XDW0.DE achieves a 12.83% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 31.47% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XDW0.DE vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDW0.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XDW0.DE vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.DE) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XDW0.DE vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
XDW0.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDW0.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.41% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% | 1.09% | 1.07% |
Drawdowns
XDW0.DE vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDW0.DE drawdown since its inception was -61.44%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDW0.DE and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XDW0.DE vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.DE) is 3.92%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 5.17%. This indicates that XDW0.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.