XDW0.DE vs. IWDA.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.DE) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L).
XDW0.DE and IWDA.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XDW0.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. It was launched on Mar 9, 2016. IWDA.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World Index. It was launched on Sep 25, 2009. Both XDW0.DE and IWDA.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XDW0.DE or IWDA.L.
Key characteristics
| XDW0.DE | IWDA.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 4.48% | 15.69% |
| 1Y Return | -4.36% | 25.44% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 22.82% | 7.22% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 9.14% | 12.32% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.15 | 2.02 |
| Daily Std Dev | 17.21% | 12.17% |
| Max Drawdown | -61.44% | -34.11% |
| Current Drawdown | -11.82% | -0.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDW0.DE and IWDA.L is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
XDW0.DE vs. IWDA.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XDW0.DE achieves a 4.48% return, which is significantly lower than IWDA.L's 15.69% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XDW0.DE vs. IWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDW0.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IWDA.L's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XDW0.DE vs. IWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.DE) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XDW0.DE vs. IWDA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDW0.DE nor IWDA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XDW0.DE vs. IWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDW0.DE drawdown since its inception was -61.44%, which is greater than IWDA.L's maximum drawdown of -34.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDW0.DE and IWDA.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XDW0.DE vs. IWDA.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.55% compared to iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L) at 3.72%. This indicates that XDW0.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.