PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
XDTE vs. FBCG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XDTE vs. FBCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
13.34%
12.15%
XDTE
FBCG

Returns By Period


XDTE

YTD

N/A

1M

1.28%

6M

13.67%

1Y

N/A

5Y (annualized)

N/A

10Y (annualized)

N/A

FBCG

YTD

34.26%

1M

1.66%

6M

12.23%

1Y

42.74%

5Y (annualized)

N/A

10Y (annualized)

N/A

Key characteristics


XDTEFBCG
Daily Std Dev12.01%19.65%
Max Drawdown-6.90%-43.56%
Current Drawdown-1.53%-3.25%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XDTE vs. FBCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDTE has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FBCG's 0.59% expense ratio.


XDTE
Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
Expense ratio chart for XDTE: current value at 0.95% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.95%
Expense ratio chart for FBCG: current value at 0.59% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.59%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between XDTE and FBCG is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

XDTE vs. FBCG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
No data
XDTE
FBCG

Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

XDTE vs. FBCG - Dividend Comparison

XDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.45%, more than FBCG's 0.02% yield.


TTM2023202220212020
XDTE
Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
15.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FBCG
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
0.02%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Drawdowns

XDTE vs. FBCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDTE drawdown since its inception was -6.90%, smaller than the maximum FBCG drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDTE and FBCG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-1.53%
-3.25%
XDTE
FBCG

Volatility

XDTE vs. FBCG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE) is 3.66%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) has a volatility of 5.90%. This indicates that XDTE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.66%
5.90%
XDTE
FBCG