XDN0.L vs. VWRL.AS
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI Nordic UCITS ETF 1D (XDN0.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRL.AS).
XDN0.L and VWRL.AS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XDN0.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI Nordic Countries NR EUR. It was launched on Sep 4, 2013. VWRL.AS is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on May 22, 2012. Both XDN0.L and VWRL.AS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XDN0.L or VWRL.AS.
Key characteristics
| XDN0.L | VWRL.AS | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -0.39% | 23.73% |
| 1Y Return | 8.62% | 30.45% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 1.57% | 8.73% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 10.54% | 11.77% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 12.16% | 10.80% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.65 | 2.79 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.03 | 3.69 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.12 | 1.57 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.73 | 3.61 |
| Martin Ratio | 2.08 | 17.65 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.14% | 1.65% |
| Daily Std Dev | 13.30% | 10.41% |
| Max Drawdown | -24.85% | -33.27% |
| Current Drawdown | -11.76% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDN0.L and VWRL.AS is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
XDN0.L vs. VWRL.AS - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XDN0.L achieves a -0.39% return, which is significantly lower than VWRL.AS's 23.73% return. Over the past 10 years, XDN0.L has outperformed VWRL.AS with an annualized return of 12.16%, while VWRL.AS has yielded a comparatively lower 10.80% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XDN0.L vs. VWRL.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDN0.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than VWRL.AS's 0.22% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XDN0.L vs. VWRL.AS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Nordic UCITS ETF 1D (XDN0.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRL.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XDN0.L vs. VWRL.AS - Dividend Comparison
XDN0.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, more than VWRL.AS's 1.45% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDN0.L Xtrackers MSCI Nordic UCITS ETF 1D | 2.68% | 2.51% | 4.53% | 1.09% | 4.82% | 4.18% | 1.05% | 2.34% | 1.52% | 0.00% | 3.16% | 0.00% |
VWRL.AS Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF | 1.45% | 1.74% | 2.10% | 1.43% | 1.56% | 1.89% | 2.24% | 1.93% | 1.95% | 2.03% | 2.06% | 1.57% |
Drawdowns
XDN0.L vs. VWRL.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDN0.L drawdown since its inception was -24.85%, smaller than the maximum VWRL.AS drawdown of -33.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDN0.L and VWRL.AS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XDN0.L vs. VWRL.AS - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Nordic UCITS ETF 1D (XDN0.L) has a higher volatility of 3.98% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRL.AS) at 2.95%. This indicates that XDN0.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWRL.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.