PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
XDEQ.L vs. HSXJ.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


XDEQ.LHSXJ.L
YTD Return13.77%8.08%
1Y Return19.98%8.49%
3Y Return (Ann)9.32%0.10%
Sharpe Ratio1.830.25
Daily Std Dev11.33%33.23%
Max Drawdown-23.79%-25.60%
Current Drawdown-2.04%-12.18%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.7

The correlation between XDEQ.L and HSXJ.L is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

XDEQ.L vs. HSXJ.L - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, XDEQ.L achieves a 13.77% return, which is significantly higher than HSXJ.L's 8.08% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%70.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
64.96%
17.50%
XDEQ.L
HSXJ.L

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XDEQ.L vs. HSXJ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XDEQ.L and HSXJ.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


XDEQ.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C
Expense ratio chart for XDEQ.L: current value at 0.25% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.25%
Expense ratio chart for HSXJ.L: current value at 0.25% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.25%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

XDEQ.L vs. HSXJ.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L) and HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSXJ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDEQ.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XDEQ.L, currently valued at 2.14, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.14
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for XDEQ.L, currently valued at 3.03, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.03
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for XDEQ.L, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.29
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for XDEQ.L, currently valued at 2.23, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.23
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for XDEQ.L, currently valued at 11.29, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0011.29
HSXJ.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for HSXJ.L, currently valued at 0.44, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.44
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for HSXJ.L, currently valued at 0.89, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.89
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for HSXJ.L, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.23
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for HSXJ.L, currently valued at 0.49, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.49
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for HSXJ.L, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.001.12

XDEQ.L vs. HSXJ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDEQ.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is higher than the HSXJ.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.25. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of XDEQ.L and HSXJ.L.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
2.14
0.44
XDEQ.L
HSXJ.L

Dividends

XDEQ.L vs. HSXJ.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDEQ.L nor HSXJ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2023202220212020201920182017201620152014
XDEQ.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.51%
HSXJ.L
HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

XDEQ.L vs. HSXJ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDEQ.L drawdown since its inception was -23.79%, smaller than the maximum HSXJ.L drawdown of -25.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEQ.L and HSXJ.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-1.39%
-14.92%
XDEQ.L
HSXJ.L

Volatility

XDEQ.L vs. HSXJ.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L) is 4.30%, while HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSXJ.L) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that XDEQ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HSXJ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
4.30%
4.64%
XDEQ.L
HSXJ.L