XDEQ.L vs. GLDA.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L) and Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.L).
XDEQ.L and GLDA.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XDEQ.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Sep 11, 2014. GLDA.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Gold. It was launched on May 21, 2019. Both XDEQ.L and GLDA.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XDEQ.L or GLDA.L.
Performance
XDEQ.L vs. GLDA.L - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDEQ.L achieves a 18.50% return, which is significantly lower than GLDA.L's 27.21% return.
XDEQ.L
18.50%
0.90%
6.15%
23.61%
12.65%
12.80%
GLDA.L
27.21%
-0.88%
9.00%
29.37%
N/A
N/A
Key characteristics
| XDEQ.L | GLDA.L | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.12 | 0.87 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.05 | 1.48 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.39 | 1.39 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.58 | 1.50 |
| Martin Ratio | 12.80 | 4.05 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.80% | 7.57% |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.84% | 35.17% |
| Max Drawdown | -23.79% | -21.57% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.24% | -3.55% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XDEQ.L vs. GLDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDEQ.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDA.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between XDEQ.L and GLDA.L is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XDEQ.L vs. GLDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L) and Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XDEQ.L vs. GLDA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDEQ.L nor GLDA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDEQ.L Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.51% |
GLDA.L Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
XDEQ.L vs. GLDA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDEQ.L drawdown since its inception was -23.79%, which is greater than GLDA.L's maximum drawdown of -21.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEQ.L and GLDA.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XDEQ.L vs. GLDA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L) is 2.89%, while Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.L) has a volatility of 5.37%. This indicates that XDEQ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.