XDEM.DE vs. IWDA.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.DE) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L).
XDEM.DE and IWDA.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XDEM.DE is a passively managed fund by DWS Investment S.A. (ETF) that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Growth NR USD. It was launched on Sep 5, 2014. IWDA.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World Index. It was launched on Sep 25, 2009. Both XDEM.DE and IWDA.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XDEM.DE or IWDA.L.
Performance
XDEM.DE vs. IWDA.L - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDEM.DE achieves a 36.19% return, which is significantly higher than IWDA.L's 18.98% return. Over the past 10 years, XDEM.DE has outperformed IWDA.L with an annualized return of 16.16%, while IWDA.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.90% annualized return.
XDEM.DE
36.19%
1.30%
10.01%
40.56%
13.43%
16.16%
IWDA.L
18.98%
-0.47%
7.66%
27.05%
12.16%
9.90%
Key characteristics
| XDEM.DE | IWDA.L | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.35 | 2.33 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.01 | 3.26 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.46 | 1.43 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.74 | 3.48 |
| Martin Ratio | 11.13 | 15.00 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.55% | 1.75% |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.67% | 11.25% |
| Max Drawdown | -30.93% | -34.11% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.48% | -1.81% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XDEM.DE vs. IWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDEM.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IWDA.L's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between XDEM.DE and IWDA.L is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XDEM.DE vs. IWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.DE) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XDEM.DE vs. IWDA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDEM.DE nor IWDA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDEM.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.63% |
IWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
XDEM.DE vs. IWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDEM.DE drawdown since its inception was -30.93%, smaller than the maximum IWDA.L drawdown of -34.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEM.DE and IWDA.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XDEM.DE vs. IWDA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.DE) is 3.07%, while iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L) has a volatility of 3.59%. This indicates that XDEM.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.