XDEB.DE vs. WLDL.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE) and Lyxor MSCI World UCITS ETF - Dist (WLDL.L).
XDEB.DE and WLDL.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XDEB.DE is a passively managed fund by DWS Investment S.A. (ETF) that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Sep 5, 2014. WLDL.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Apr 26, 2006. Both XDEB.DE and WLDL.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XDEB.DE or WLDL.L.
Key characteristics
| XDEB.DE | WLDL.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 19.88% | 20.19% |
| 1Y Return | 22.37% | 25.00% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 7.06% | 10.13% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 6.81% | 16.33% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.92 | 2.79 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.28 | 3.89 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.57 | 1.54 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.00 | 4.45 |
| Martin Ratio | 18.13 | 20.50 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.28% | 1.42% |
| Daily Std Dev | 7.87% | 10.37% |
| Max Drawdown | -28.57% | -24.76% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.46% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDEB.DE and WLDL.L is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
XDEB.DE vs. WLDL.L - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XDEB.DE having a 19.88% return and WLDL.L slightly higher at 20.19%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XDEB.DE vs. WLDL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDEB.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than WLDL.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XDEB.DE vs. WLDL.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE) and Lyxor MSCI World UCITS ETF - Dist (WLDL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XDEB.DE vs. WLDL.L - Dividend Comparison
XDEB.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WLDL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDEB.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.72% |
WLDL.L Lyxor MSCI World UCITS ETF - Dist | 1.11% | 1.34% | 1.90% | 1.34% | 1.58% | 1.57% | 2.41% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
XDEB.DE vs. WLDL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDEB.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.57%, which is greater than WLDL.L's maximum drawdown of -24.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEB.DE and WLDL.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XDEB.DE vs. WLDL.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE) is 2.25%, while Lyxor MSCI World UCITS ETF - Dist (WLDL.L) has a volatility of 2.88%. This indicates that XDEB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WLDL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.