PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDEB.DE vs. VSMGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDEB.DE vs. VSMGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE) and Vanguard LifeStrategy 60/40 Fund (VSMGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDEB.DE is traded in EUR, while VSMGX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VSMGX values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDEB.DE achieves a 3.07% return, which is significantly lower than VSMGX's 10.24% return. Over the past 10 years, XDEB.DE has underperformed VSMGX with an annualized return of 7.15%, while VSMGX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.72% annualized return.


XDEB.DE

1D
-0.28%
1M
0.84%
YTD
3.07%
6M
3.66%
1Y
4.26%
3Y*
7.61%
5Y*
6.05%
10Y*
7.15%

VSMGX

1D
0.35%
1M
1.73%
YTD
10.24%
6M
9.96%
1Y
19.37%
3Y*
13.69%
5Y*
8.42%
10Y*
8.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDEB.DE vs. VSMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDEB.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C
3.07%-1.27%17.84%3.65%-4.26%24.29%-6.66%26.15%2.01%3.04%
VSMGX
Vanguard LifeStrategy 60/40 Fund
10.24%2.46%22.62%12.23%-10.81%18.31%4.23%22.07%-0.44%-0.31%

Correlation

The correlation between XDEB.DE and VSMGX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2014

0.55

Over the past year, the correlation between XDEB.DE and VSMGX has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDEB.DE vs. VSMGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDEB.DE
XDEB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
XDEB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

VSMGX
VSMGX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
VSMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
VSMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDEB.DE vs. VSMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE) and Vanguard LifeStrategy 60/40 Fund (VSMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDEB.DEVSMGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.43

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

4.25

-3.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.08

15.78

-13.70

XDEB.DE vs. VSMGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDEB.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the VSMGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDEB.DE and VSMGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDEB.DE vs. VSMGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDEB.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.56%, smaller than the maximum VSMGX drawdown of -33.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEB.DE and VSMGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDEB.DEVSMGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.56%

-33.96%

+5.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.31%

-4.45%

-0.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.02%

-15.63%

+2.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.02%

-15.63%

+2.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.56%

-22.10%

-6.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.29%

-0.49%

-4.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.78%

-5.51%

-1.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

1.20%

+0.84%

Volatility

XDEB.DE vs. VSMGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE) is 2.02%, while Vanguard LifeStrategy 60/40 Fund (VSMGX) has a volatility of 2.86%. This indicates that XDEB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VSMGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDEB.DEVSMGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.02%

2.86%

-0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.60%

6.55%

-0.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.95%

8.54%

-0.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.16%

10.20%

-0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.74%

11.10%

+1.64%

XDEB.DE vs. VSMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDEB.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VSMGX's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDEB.DE vs. VSMGX - Dividend Comparison

XDEB.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VSMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VSMGX
Vanguard LifeStrategy 60/40 Fund
4.92%5.25%11.49%4.01%2.66%3.86%3.46%2.52%4.11%1.09%2.26%3.89%
XDEB.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDEB.DE and VSMGX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDEB.DE and VSMGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer