PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCEM vs. BITO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XCEM vs. BITO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XCEM vs. BITO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XCEM
Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF
7.38%34.05%0.42%19.96%-17.59%-2.19%
BITO
ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF
-22.79%-11.19%104.45%137.33%-63.91%-31.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCEM achieves a 7.38% return, which is significantly higher than BITO's -22.79% return.


XCEM

1D
0.93%
1M
-7.91%
YTD
7.38%
6M
16.57%
1Y
43.07%
3Y*
17.87%
5Y*
7.54%
10Y*
10.01%

BITO

1D
0.60%
1M
-1.72%
YTD
-22.79%
6M
-43.10%
1Y
-23.27%
3Y*
24.87%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XCEM vs. BITO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCEM has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than BITO's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XCEM vs. BITO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCEM
XCEM Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
XCEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCEM Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
XCEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCEM Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

BITO
BITO Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
BITO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITO Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITO Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
BITO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITO Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCEM vs. BITO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XCEMBITODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.14

-0.52

+2.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.82

-0.50

+3.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

0.94

+0.47

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

-0.42

+3.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.61

-0.89

+13.50

XCEM vs. BITO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the BITO Sharpe Ratio of -0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCEM and BITO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XCEMBITODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

-0.52

+2.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

-0.08

+0.59

Correlation

The correlation between XCEM and BITO is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

XCEM vs. BITO - Dividend Comparison

XCEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%, less than BITO's 80.47% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XCEM
Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF
3.03%3.25%2.76%1.22%2.42%1.94%1.63%2.11%2.70%9.56%1.24%2.63%
BITO
ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF
80.47%78.29%61.59%15.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

XCEM vs. BITO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCEM drawdown since its inception was -41.24%, smaller than the maximum BITO drawdown of -77.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCEM and BITO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XCEMBITODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.24%

-77.86%

+36.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.46%

-50.05%

+35.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.16%

-46.75%

+36.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.70%

-36.57%

+27.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.51%

23.73%

-20.22%

Volatility

XCEM vs. BITO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM) is 10.37%, while ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) has a volatility of 12.84%. This indicates that XCEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XCEMBITODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.37%

12.84%

-2.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.60%

36.71%

-21.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.21%

45.32%

-25.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.15%

55.77%

-38.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.53%

55.77%

-36.24%