XCEM vs. BITO
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO).
XCEM and BITO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XCEM is a passively managed fund by Ameriprise Financial that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. It was launched on Sep 2, 2015. BITO is an actively managed fund by ProShares. It was launched on Oct 19, 2021.
Performance
XCEM vs. BITO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XCEM vs. BITO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCEM Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF | 7.38% | 34.05% | 0.42% | 19.96% | -17.59% | -2.19% |
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF | -22.79% | -11.19% | 104.45% | 137.33% | -63.91% | -31.09% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCEM achieves a 7.38% return, which is significantly higher than BITO's -22.79% return.
XCEM
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- -7.91%
- YTD
- 7.38%
- 6M
- 16.57%
- 1Y
- 43.07%
- 3Y*
- 17.87%
- 5Y*
- 7.54%
- 10Y*
- 10.01%
BITO
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -1.72%
- YTD
- -22.79%
- 6M
- -43.10%
- 1Y
- -23.27%
- 3Y*
- 24.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XCEM vs. BITO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCEM has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than BITO's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XCEM vs. BITO — Risk / Return Rank
XCEM
BITO
XCEM vs. BITO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCEM | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.14 | -0.52 | +2.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.82 | -0.50 | +3.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 0.94 | +0.47 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | -0.42 | +3.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.61 | -0.89 | +13.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCEM | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.14 | -0.52 | +2.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | -0.08 | +0.59 |
Correlation
The correlation between XCEM and BITO is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
XCEM vs. BITO - Dividend Comparison
XCEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%, less than BITO's 80.47% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCEM Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF | 3.03% | 3.25% | 2.76% | 1.22% | 2.42% | 1.94% | 1.63% | 2.11% | 2.70% | 9.56% | 1.24% | 2.63% |
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF | 80.47% | 78.29% | 61.59% | 15.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
XCEM vs. BITO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCEM drawdown since its inception was -41.24%, smaller than the maximum BITO drawdown of -77.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCEM and BITO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCEM | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.24% | -77.86% | +36.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.46% | -50.05% | +35.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.67% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.16% | -46.75% | +36.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.70% | -36.57% | +27.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.51% | 23.73% | -20.22% |
Volatility
XCEM vs. BITO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM) is 10.37%, while ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) has a volatility of 12.84%. This indicates that XCEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XCEM | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.37% | 12.84% | -2.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.60% | 36.71% | -21.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.21% | 45.32% | -25.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.15% | 55.77% | -38.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.53% | 55.77% | -36.24% |