XC vs. FNDF
Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (XC) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF).
XC and FNDF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XC is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Sep 20, 2022. FNDF is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Large Company Index. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013. Both XC and FNDF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XC vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XC vs. FNDF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XC WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund | -3.53% | 18.19% | 5.49% | 21.31% | 1.49% |
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF | 8.23% | 40.99% | 2.29% | 20.22% | 10.94% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XC achieves a -3.53% return, which is significantly lower than FNDF's 8.23% return.
XC
- 1D
- 3.04%
- 1M
- -8.43%
- YTD
- -3.53%
- 6M
- 0.10%
- 1Y
- 17.84%
- 3Y*
- 11.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNDF
- 1D
- 2.95%
- 1M
- -7.26%
- YTD
- 8.23%
- 6M
- 17.33%
- 1Y
- 40.22%
- 3Y*
- 20.38%
- 5Y*
- 12.44%
- 10Y*
- 11.09%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XC vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison
XC has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XC vs. FNDF — Risk / Return Rank
XC
FNDF
XC vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (XC) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XC | FNDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.07 | 2.31 | -1.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.59 | 3.02 | -1.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.46 | -0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.39 | 3.52 | -2.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.13 | 13.78 | -8.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XC | FNDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | 2.31 | -1.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.49 | +0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between XC and FNDF is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XC vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison
XC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.42%, more than FNDF's 3.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XC WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund | 12.42% | 11.74% | 1.49% | 1.42% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF | 3.18% | 3.44% | 4.01% | 3.41% | 3.10% | 3.54% | 2.17% | 3.20% | 3.47% | 2.32% | 2.42% | 2.08% |
Drawdowns
XC vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XC drawdown since its inception was -20.97%, smaller than the maximum FNDF drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XC and FNDF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XC | FNDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.97% | -40.14% | +19.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.47% | -11.08% | -1.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.41% | -7.26% | -2.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.99% | -7.72% | +3.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.39% | 2.83% | +0.56% |
Volatility
XC vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (XC) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) have volatilities of 7.82% and 8.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XC | FNDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.82% | 8.06% | -0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.76% | 11.42% | -0.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.80% | 17.50% | -0.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.73% | 16.05% | -0.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.73% | 17.64% | -1.91% |