PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XBIO vs. LU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

XBIO vs. LU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xenetic Biosciences, Inc. (XBIO) and Lufax Holding Ltd (LU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XBIO achieves a 33.64% return, which is significantly higher than LU's -50.00% return.


XBIO

1D
0.00%
1M
-4.26%
YTD
33.64%
6M
31.82%
1Y
-7.79%
3Y*
-3.03%
5Y*
-32.44%
10Y*
-41.56%

LU

1D
0.79%
1M
-21.95%
YTD
-50.00%
6M
-51.52%
1Y
-54.61%
3Y*
-18.54%
5Y*
-41.08%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBIO vs. LU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XBIO
Xenetic Biosciences, Inc.
33.64%-45.61%15.65%21.01%-77.90%-36.76%144.43%
LU
Lufax Holding Ltd
-50.00%7.11%73.97%-58.03%-60.48%-60.35%22.41%

Correlation

The correlation between XBIO and LU is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2020

0.12

The correlation between XBIO and LU shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (3 years) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM)

XBIO:

$3.19M

LU:

CN¥31.92B

Gross Profit (TTM)

XBIO:

$2.38M

LU:

CN¥13.50B

EBITDA (TTM)

XBIO:

-$2.37M

LU:

-CN¥1.26B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XBIO vs. LU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XBIO
XBIO Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
XBIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBIO Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
XBIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBIO Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

LU
LU Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
LU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LU Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
LU Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
LU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
LU Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBIO vs. LU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xenetic Biosciences, Inc. (XBIO) and Lufax Holding Ltd (LU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XBIOLUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

0.80

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.10

-0.76

+0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.13

-1.35

+1.22

XBIO vs. LU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XBIO Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is higher than the LU Sharpe Ratio of -1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XBIO and LU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XBIO vs. LU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBIO drawdown since its inception was -99.95%, roughly equal to the maximum LU drawdown of -96.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBIO and LU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XBIOLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.95%

-96.68%

-3.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-80.50%

-71.59%

-8.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-80.50%

-71.59%

-8.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.19%

-94.66%

-1.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.93%

-95.59%

-4.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-91.41%

-78.47%

-12.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

62.07%

40.52%

+21.55%

Volatility

XBIO vs. LU - Volatility Comparison

Xenetic Biosciences, Inc. (XBIO) has a higher volatility of 18.22% compared to Lufax Holding Ltd (LU) at 13.40%. This indicates that XBIO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XBIOLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.22%

13.40%

+4.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.08%

34.99%

+16.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

168.63%

53.31%

+115.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

107.80%

76.72%

+31.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

134.13%

76.15%

+57.98%

Dividends

XBIO vs. LU - Dividend Comparison

Neither XBIO nor LU has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
LU
Lufax Holding Ltd
0.00%0.00%101.26%11.60%26.29%
XBIO
Xenetic Biosciences, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

XBIO vs. LU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Xenetic Biosciences, Inc. and Lufax Holding Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
806.92K
4.45B
(XBIO) Total Revenue
(LU) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. XBIO values in USD, LU values in CNY

Frequently Asked Questions


XBIO and LU have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XBIO has higher volatility (18.22%) compared to LU (13.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XBIO dropped -99.95% vs LU's -96.68%.

XBIO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.05 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XBIO and LU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer