PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
XBB.TO vs. FFRHX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


XBB.TOFFRHX
YTD Return3.71%7.97%
1Y Return10.19%9.98%
3Y Return (Ann)0.03%6.37%
5Y Return (Ann)0.63%5.65%
10Y Return (Ann)2.01%4.59%
Sharpe Ratio1.763.78
Sortino Ratio2.5512.09
Omega Ratio1.313.99
Calmar Ratio0.7211.27
Martin Ratio6.1260.05
Ulcer Index1.69%0.16%
Daily Std Dev5.91%2.56%
Max Drawdown-18.16%-22.19%
Current Drawdown-5.57%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between XBB.TO and FFRHX is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

XBB.TO vs. FFRHX - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, XBB.TO achieves a 3.71% return, which is significantly lower than FFRHX's 7.97% return. Over the past 10 years, XBB.TO has underperformed FFRHX with an annualized return of 2.01%, while FFRHX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.59% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.01%
4.13%
XBB.TO
FFRHX

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XBB.TO vs. FFRHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBB.TO has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FFRHX's 0.67% expense ratio.


FFRHX
Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund
Expense ratio chart for FFRHX: current value at 0.67% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.67%
Expense ratio chart for XBB.TO: current value at 0.10% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.10%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

XBB.TO vs. FFRHX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Canadian Universe Bond Index ETF (XBB.TO) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XBB.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XBB.TO, currently valued at 0.81, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.000.81
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for XBB.TO, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.17
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for XBB.TO, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.15
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for XBB.TO, currently valued at 0.34, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.34
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for XBB.TO, currently valued at 1.80, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.001.80
FFRHX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FFRHX, currently valued at 3.83, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.003.83
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FFRHX, currently valued at 12.36, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0012.36
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FFRHX, currently valued at 4.13, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.004.13
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FFRHX, currently valued at 11.41, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0011.41
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FFRHX, currently valued at 59.90, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0059.90

XBB.TO vs. FFRHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XBB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is lower than the FFRHX Sharpe Ratio of 3.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XBB.TO and FFRHX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.005.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.81
3.83
XBB.TO
FFRHX

Dividends

XBB.TO vs. FFRHX - Dividend Comparison

XBB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, less than FFRHX's 8.38% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
XBB.TO
iShares Core Canadian Universe Bond Index ETF
3.20%3.01%2.91%2.54%2.55%2.80%2.92%2.83%2.81%2.87%3.04%3.32%
FFRHX
Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund
8.38%8.25%5.06%3.27%3.85%5.17%4.75%4.01%3.94%4.25%4.00%3.46%

Drawdowns

XBB.TO vs. FFRHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBB.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.16%, smaller than the maximum FFRHX drawdown of -22.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBB.TO and FFRHX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-14.13%
0
XBB.TO
FFRHX

Volatility

XBB.TO vs. FFRHX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core Canadian Universe Bond Index ETF (XBB.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.53% compared to Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX) at 0.62%. This indicates that XBB.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFRHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%2.50%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.53%
0.62%
XBB.TO
FFRHX