PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XBB.TO vs. FBND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XBB.TO vs. FBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core Canadian Universe Bond Index ETF (XBB.TO) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XBB.TO is traded in CAD, while FBND is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FBND values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XBB.TO achieves a 1.58% return, which is significantly lower than FBND's 2.00% return. Over the past 10 years, XBB.TO has underperformed FBND with an annualized return of 1.67%, while FBND has yielded a comparatively higher 3.41% annualized return.


XBB.TO

1D
0.07%
1M
1.55%
YTD
1.58%
6M
1.08%
1Y
2.98%
3Y*
4.28%
5Y*
0.72%
10Y*
1.67%

FBND

1D
0.21%
1M
2.39%
YTD
2.00%
6M
0.26%
1Y
6.86%
3Y*
5.99%
5Y*
3.76%
10Y*
3.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBB.TO vs. FBND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XBB.TO
iShares Core Canadian Universe Bond Index ETF
1.58%2.59%4.00%6.64%-11.66%-2.81%8.58%7.28%1.00%2.42%
FBND
Fidelity Total Bond ETF
2.00%2.63%10.91%4.46%-6.31%-1.33%7.57%4.42%7.87%-3.07%

Correlation

The correlation between XBB.TO and FBND is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2014

0.49

The correlation between XBB.TO and FBND shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.61 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XBB.TO vs. FBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XBB.TO
XBB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
XBB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
XBB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

FBND
FBND Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
FBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBND Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBND Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBB.TO vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Canadian Universe Bond Index ETF (XBB.TO) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XBB.TOFBNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.23

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

1.60

-0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.56

3.70

-1.14

XBB.TO vs. FBND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XBB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the FBND Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XBB.TO and FBND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XBB.TOFBNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

1.28

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.51

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

0.43

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.55

+0.17

Drawdowns

XBB.TO vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBB.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.16%, which is greater than FBND's maximum drawdown of -15.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBB.TO and FBND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XBB.TOFBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.16%

-15.99%

-2.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.73%

-4.29%

+1.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.42%

-6.71%

+1.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.90%

-12.86%

-3.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.16%

-15.99%

-2.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.32%

-1.06%

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.76%

-4.71%

+1.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

1.86%

-0.69%

Volatility

XBB.TO vs. FBND - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core Canadian Universe Bond Index ETF (XBB.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.54% compared to Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) at 1.27%. This indicates that XBB.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XBB.TOFBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.54%

1.27%

+0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.40%

4.18%

-0.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.38%

5.41%

-1.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.62%

7.47%

-0.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.69%

7.95%

-1.26%

XBB.TO vs. FBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBB.TO has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FBND's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

XBB.TO vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison

XBB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, less than FBND's 4.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBND
Fidelity Total Bond ETF
4.70%4.70%4.73%4.26%3.07%1.86%4.25%2.90%2.93%2.56%2.84%3.26%
XBB.TO
iShares Core Canadian Universe Bond Index ETF
3.40%3.39%3.25%3.01%2.91%2.54%2.55%2.80%2.92%2.83%2.81%2.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


XBB.TO and FBND have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XBB.TO is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XBB.TO is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for FBND.

XBB.TO is categorized as Canadian Government Bonds, while FBND is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for XBB.TO and 0.36% for FBND.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XBB.TO and FBND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer