XAR vs. SPYG
XAR (SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XAR is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index, while SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XAR returned 18.01%/yr vs 18.20%/yr for SPYG. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XAR charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.
Performance
XAR vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XAR having a 13.40% return and SPYG slightly higher at 13.75%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XAR having a 18.01% annualized return and SPYG not far ahead at 18.20%.
XAR
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- 7.34%
- YTD
- 13.40%
- 6M
- 20.10%
- 1Y
- 41.33%
- 3Y*
- 34.11%
- 5Y*
- 16.26%
- 10Y*
- 18.01%
SPYG
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 7.38%
- YTD
- 13.75%
- 6M
- 13.57%
- 1Y
- 33.95%
- 3Y*
- 28.16%
- 5Y*
- 16.07%
- 10Y*
- 18.20%
XAR vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 13.40% | 46.15% | 23.32% | 23.79% | -5.02% | 2.31% | 6.18% | 39.33% | -4.58% | 33.00% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 13.75% | 22.09% | 35.99% | 30.02% | -29.41% | 32.01% | 33.46% | 30.84% | -0.12% | 27.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between XAR and SPYG is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2011 | 0.60 |
The correlation between XAR and SPYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
XAR vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XAR
SPYG
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
XAR
SPYG
Technology
XAR
SPYG
Basic Materials
XAR
-
SPYG
Communication Services
XAR
-
SPYG
Consumer Cyclical
XAR
-
SPYG
Consumer Defensive
XAR
-
SPYG
Energy
XAR
-
SPYG
Financial Services
XAR
-
SPYG
Healthcare
XAR
-
SPYG
Real Estate
XAR
-
SPYG
Utilities
XAR
-
SPYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XAR vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank
XAR
SPYG
XAR vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XAR | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.37 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 2.48 | -0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.85 | 10.25 | -3.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XAR | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55 | 2.12 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.76 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | 0.88 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 0.35 | +0.49 |
Drawdowns
XAR vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XAR drawdown since its inception was -46.37%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAR and SPYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XAR | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.37% | -67.63% | +21.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.22% | -13.76% | -3.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.73% | -22.14% | +2.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.40% | -32.67% | +0.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.37% | -32.67% | -13.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.55% | -1.13% | -5.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.79% | -24.33% | +17.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.05% | 3.32% | +2.73% |
Volatility
XAR vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) has a higher volatility of 9.52% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) at 4.35%. This indicates that XAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XAR | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.52% | 4.35% | +5.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.39% | 12.46% | +9.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.81% | 16.06% | +10.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.41% | 21.17% | +2.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.62% | 20.64% | +3.98% |
XAR vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
XAR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
XAR vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison
XAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than SPYG's 0.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.47% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.32% | 0.40% | 0.66% | 0.54% | 0.50% | 0.83% | 0.63% | 0.75% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 2.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XAR and SPYG have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XAR has higher volatility (9.52%) compared to SPYG (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XAR dropped -46.37% vs SPYG's -67.63%.
On 10-year performance, SPYG leads with 18.20% vs 18.01% for XAR. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYG has been the lower-risk option at 4.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 18.20% return vs 18.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XAR.
SPYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.47%, compared with 0.32% for XAR.
XAR is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while SPYG is S&P 500. XAR tracks S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XAR and 0.04% for SPYG.
SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XAR and SPYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer