PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XAR vs. SPYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XAR vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XAR having a 9.86% return and SPYG slightly higher at 10.06%. Over a longer period, both investments have demonstrated similar performance, with their 10-year annualized returns being quite close: XAR at 17.38% and SPYG at 17.38%.


XAR

1D
0.77%
1M
-7.89%
6M
-2.90%
YTD
9.86%
1Y
24.03%
3Y*
29.11%
5Y*
16.36%
10Y*
17.38%
ALL TIME*
18.36%

SPYG

1D
1.45%
1M
-0.05%
6M
9.50%
YTD
10.06%
1Y
21.72%
3Y*
24.04%
5Y*
13.28%
10Y*
17.38%
ALL TIME*
7.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$321.11M$273.47M$308.09M
$64.82M$59.56M$61.10M

XAR vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XAR
SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF
9.86%46.15%23.32%23.79%-5.02%2.31%6.18%39.33%-4.58%33.00%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
10.06%22.09%35.99%30.02%-29.41%32.01%33.46%30.84%-0.12%27.24%

Correlation

The correlation between XAR and SPYG is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2011

0.60

The correlation between XAR and SPYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

XAR vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XAR
SPYG

Industrials

95.8%
6.4%

Basic Materials

3.1%
0.3%

Technology

1.0%
52.3%

Communication Services

-

15.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.0%

Energy

-

0.1%

Financial Services

-

8.7%

Healthcare

-

6.2%

Real Estate

-

0.6%

Utilities

-

0.4%

Industrials

XAR
95.8%
SPYG
6.4%

Basic Materials

XAR
3.1%
SPYG
0.3%

Technology

XAR
1.0%
SPYG
52.3%

Communication Services

XAR

-

SPYG
15.6%

Consumer Cyclical

XAR

-

SPYG
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

XAR

-

SPYG
1.0%

Energy

XAR

-

SPYG
0.1%

Financial Services

XAR

-

SPYG
8.7%

Healthcare

XAR

-

SPYG
6.2%

Real Estate

XAR

-

SPYG
0.6%

Utilities

XAR

-

SPYG
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XAR vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XAR
XAR Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
XAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAR Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
XAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAR Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XAR vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XARSPYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.19

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

1.42

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.45

5.17

-1.72

XAR vs. SPYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAR Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is comparable to the SPYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAR and SPYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XAR vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAR drawdown since its inception was -46.37%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAR and SPYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XARSPYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.37%

-67.63%

+21.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.22%

-13.76%

-3.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.73%

-22.14%

+2.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.55%

-32.67%

+5.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.37%

-32.67%

-13.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.47%

-4.33%

-5.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.78%

-24.20%

+17.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.61%

3.78%

+2.83%

Volatility

XAR vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) has a higher volatility of 8.97% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) at 6.08%. This indicates that XAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XARSPYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.97%

6.08%

+2.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.17%

14.85%

+8.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.75%

18.18%

+10.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.84%

21.50%

+2.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.85%

20.79%

+4.06%

XAR vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XAR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

XAR vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison

XAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than SPYG's 0.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.49%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%
XAR
SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF
0.31%0.40%0.66%0.54%0.50%0.83%0.63%0.75%1.19%0.76%1.09%2.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


XAR and SPYG have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XAR has higher volatility (8.97%) compared to SPYG (6.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XAR dropped -46.37% vs SPYG's -67.63%.

On 10-year performance, SPYG leads with 17.38% vs 17.38% for XAR. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYG has been the lower-risk option at 6.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 17.38% return vs 17.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XAR.

SPYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.49%, compared with 0.31% for XAR.

XAR is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while SPYG is S&P 500. XAR tracks S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XAR and 0.04% for SPYG.

SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XAR and SPYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer