PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XAR vs. SPYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XAR vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAR achieves a 14.20% return, which is significantly higher than SPYG's 8.70% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XAR having a 18.43% annualized return and SPYG not far behind at 18.05%.


XAR

1D
-0.92%
1M
1.55%
YTD
14.20%
6M
10.14%
1Y
37.38%
3Y*
33.41%
5Y*
16.10%
10Y*
18.43%

SPYG

1D
-2.40%
1M
-2.07%
YTD
8.70%
6M
7.46%
1Y
26.87%
3Y*
25.48%
5Y*
14.11%
10Y*
18.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XAR vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XAR
SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF
14.20%46.15%23.32%23.79%-5.02%2.31%6.18%39.33%-4.58%33.00%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
8.70%22.09%35.99%30.02%-29.41%32.01%33.46%30.84%-0.12%27.24%

Correlation

The correlation between XAR and SPYG is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2011

0.60

The correlation between XAR and SPYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

XAR vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XAR
SPYG

Industrials

99.3%
5.4%

Technology

0.7%
52.1%

Basic Materials

-

0.3%

Communication Services

-

15.9%

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.0%

Energy

-

0.1%

Financial Services

-

9.0%

Healthcare

-

5.9%

Real Estate

-

0.6%

Utilities

-

1.2%

Industrials

XAR
99.3%
SPYG
5.4%

Technology

XAR
0.7%
SPYG
52.1%

Basic Materials

XAR

-

SPYG
0.3%

Communication Services

XAR

-

SPYG
15.9%

Consumer Cyclical

XAR

-

SPYG
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

XAR

-

SPYG
1.0%

Energy

XAR

-

SPYG
0.1%

Financial Services

XAR

-

SPYG
9.0%

Healthcare

XAR

-

SPYG
5.9%

Real Estate

XAR

-

SPYG
0.6%

Utilities

XAR

-

SPYG
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XAR vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XAR
XAR Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
XAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAR Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
XAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAR Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XAR vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XARSPYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.28

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

1.96

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.08

7.79

-1.71

XAR vs. SPYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAR Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the SPYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAR and SPYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XAR vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAR drawdown since its inception was -46.37%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAR and SPYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XARSPYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.37%

-67.63%

+21.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.22%

-13.76%

-3.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.73%

-22.14%

+2.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.40%

-32.67%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.37%

-32.67%

-13.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.89%

-5.52%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.78%

-24.28%

+17.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.16%

3.46%

+2.70%

Volatility

XAR vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) has a higher volatility of 10.65% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) at 7.26%. This indicates that XAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XARSPYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.65%

7.26%

+3.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.46%

13.90%

+9.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.98%

17.26%

+10.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.69%

21.36%

+2.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.74%

20.73%

+4.01%

XAR vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XAR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

XAR vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison

XAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than SPYG's 0.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.50%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%
XAR
SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF
0.29%0.40%0.66%0.54%0.50%0.83%0.63%0.75%1.19%0.76%1.09%2.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


XAR and SPYG have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XAR has higher volatility (10.65%) compared to SPYG (7.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XAR dropped -46.37% vs SPYG's -67.63%.

On 10-year performance, XAR leads with 18.43% vs 18.05% for SPYG. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYG has been the lower-risk option at 7.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XAR has performed better with a 18.43% return vs 18.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XAR.

SPYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.50%, compared with 0.29% for XAR.

XAR is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while SPYG is S&P 500. XAR tracks S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XAR and 0.04% for SPYG.

SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XAR and SPYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer