XAR vs. LMT
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT).
XAR is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry. It was launched on Sep 28, 2011.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XAR or LMT.
Correlation
The correlation between XAR and LMT is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
XAR vs. LMT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
XAR:
0.95
LMT:
0.12
XAR:
1.43
LMT:
0.30
XAR:
1.17
LMT:
1.05
XAR:
1.50
LMT:
0.09
XAR:
4.38
LMT:
0.19
XAR:
4.37%
LMT:
13.90%
XAR:
20.06%
LMT:
21.40%
XAR:
-46.37%
LMT:
-70.23%
XAR:
-8.88%
LMT:
-25.31%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XAR achieves a -0.67% return, which is significantly higher than LMT's -6.12% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XAR having a 11.92% annualized return and LMT not far behind at 11.56%.
XAR
-0.67%
1.28%
3.79%
20.93%
19.04%
11.92%
LMT
-6.12%
0.21%
-23.89%
2.54%
8.17%
11.56%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XAR vs. LMT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
XAR
LMT
XAR vs. LMT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XAR vs. LMT - Dividend Comparison
XAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than LMT's 2.85% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.69% | 0.66% | 0.54% | 0.50% | 0.83% | 0.63% | 0.75% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 1.10% | 2.31% | 1.07% |
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation | 2.85% | 2.62% | 2.68% | 2.34% | 2.98% | 2.76% | 2.31% | 3.13% | 2.32% | 2.71% | 2.83% | 2.85% |
Drawdowns
XAR vs. LMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XAR drawdown since its inception was -46.37%, smaller than the maximum LMT drawdown of -70.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAR and LMT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XAR vs. LMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) is 7.40%, while Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) has a volatility of 8.43%. This indicates that XAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.