PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WYNN vs. HLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WYNN vs. HLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wynn Resorts, Limited (WYNN) and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WYNN achieves a -13.49% return, which is significantly lower than HLT's 17.83% return. Over the past 10 years, WYNN has underperformed HLT with an annualized return of 1.70%, while HLT has yielded a comparatively higher 47.99% annualized return.


WYNN

1D
-1.29%
1M
-2.23%
YTD
-13.49%
6M
-17.20%
1Y
21.38%
3Y*
2.04%
5Y*
-3.53%
10Y*
1.70%

HLT

1D
2.05%
1M
8.16%
YTD
17.83%
6M
23.78%
1Y
35.85%
3Y*
33.71%
5Y*
22.40%
10Y*
47.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WYNN vs. HLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WYNN
Wynn Resorts, Limited
-13.49%41.02%-4.40%11.34%-3.02%-24.63%-18.07%44.99%-40.18%98.09%
HLT
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.
17.83%16.49%36.11%44.68%-18.72%40.20%0.47%55.48%-9.40%829.98%

Correlation

The correlation between WYNN and HLT is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2013

0.44

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WYNN:

$10.75B

HLT:

$78.45B

EPS

WYNN:

$4.10

HLT:

$6.50

PE Ratio

WYNN:

25.27

HLT:

52.03

PEG Ratio

WYNN:

6.69

HLT:

0.84

PS Ratio

WYNN:

1.47

HLT:

6.53

Total Revenue (TTM)

WYNN:

$7.29B

HLT:

$12.28B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WYNN:

$2.08B

HLT:

$5.44B

EBITDA (TTM)

WYNN:

$1.52B

HLT:

$3.00B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WYNN vs. HLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WYNN
WYNN Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
WYNN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WYNN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
WYNN Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
WYNN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
WYNN Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

HLT
HLT Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
HLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLT Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
HLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLT Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WYNN vs. HLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wynn Resorts, Limited (WYNN) and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WYNNHLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.27

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.75

3.50

-2.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.55

8.12

-6.57

WYNN vs. HLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WYNN Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the HLT Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WYNN and HLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WYNNHLTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

1.56

-0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

0.83

-0.92

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

0.27

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.23

+0.02

Drawdowns

WYNN vs. HLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WYNN drawdown since its inception was -90.66%, which is greater than HLT's maximum drawdown of -50.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WYNN and HLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WYNNHLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.66%

-50.82%

-39.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.44%

-10.29%

-18.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.54%

-26.35%

-12.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.71%

-32.65%

-27.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.40%

-50.82%

-26.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.74%

-1.34%

-48.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.19%

-9.73%

-27.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.83%

4.43%

+9.40%

Volatility

WYNN vs. HLT - Volatility Comparison

Wynn Resorts, Limited (WYNN) has a higher volatility of 9.87% compared to Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT) at 7.23%. This indicates that WYNN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WYNNHLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.87%

7.23%

+2.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.87%

17.46%

+6.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.42%

23.10%

+12.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.64%

27.08%

+14.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.96%

180.96%

-134.00%

Dividends

WYNN vs. HLT - Dividend Comparison

WYNN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, more than HLT's 0.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HLT
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.
0.18%0.21%0.24%0.33%0.36%0.00%0.13%0.54%0.84%31.40%1.03%0.65%
WYNN
Wynn Resorts, Limited
0.97%0.83%1.16%0.82%0.00%0.00%0.89%2.70%2.78%1.19%2.31%4.34%

Financials

WYNN vs. HLT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Wynn Resorts, Limited and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20222023202420252026
1.86B
2.94B
(WYNN) Total Revenue
(HLT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

WYNN vs. HLT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Wynn Resorts, Limited and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%202220232024202520260
40.3%
Portfolio components
WYNN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wynn Resorts, Limited reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

HLT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.18B and revenue of 2.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.3%.

WYNN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wynn Resorts, Limited reported an operating income of 282.60M and revenue of 1.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.2%.

HLT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 678.00M and revenue of 2.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.1%.

WYNN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wynn Resorts, Limited reported a net income of 170.80M and revenue of 1.86B, resulting in a net margin of 9.2%.

HLT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 385.00M and revenue of 2.94B, resulting in a net margin of 13.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


WYNN and HLT have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WYNN has higher volatility (9.87%) compared to HLT (7.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WYNN dropped -90.66% vs HLT's -50.82%.

HLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WYNN and HLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer