WW vs. NVO
WW (WW International, Inc.) and NVO (Novo Nordisk A/S) are both stocks. WW operates in Personal Services (Consumer Cyclical), while NVO operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, WW returned 0.55%/yr vs 6.45%/yr for NVO. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WW vs. NVO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WW achieves a -45.30% return, which is significantly lower than NVO's -12.70% return. Over the past 10 years, WW has underperformed NVO with an annualized return of 0.55%, while NVO has yielded a comparatively higher 6.45% annualized return.
WW
- 1D
- -4.77%
- 1M
- 49.77%
- YTD
- -45.30%
- 6M
- -40.04%
- 1Y
- 6,302.24%
- 3Y*
- 30.50%
- 5Y*
- -16.58%
- 10Y*
- 0.55%
NVO
- 1D
- -2.61%
- 1M
- -2.19%
- YTD
- -12.70%
- 6M
- -6.35%
- 1Y
- -38.32%
- 3Y*
- -16.12%
- 5Y*
- 3.67%
- 10Y*
- 6.45%
WW vs. NVO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WW WW International, Inc. | -45.30% | 2,200.39% | -85.49% | 126.68% | -76.07% | -33.89% | -36.14% | -0.88% | -12.94% | 286.72% |
NVO Novo Nordisk A/S | -12.70% | -39.22% | -15.93% | 54.84% | 22.66% | 63.52% | 23.33% | 28.70% | -12.98% | 52.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between WW and NVO is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2001 | 0.16 |
Fundamentals
WW:
$159.74M
NVO:
$190.94B
WW:
$38.75
NVO:
$27.42
WW:
0.41
NVO:
1.57
WW:
0.00
NVO:
0.07
WW:
0.64
NVO:
0.58
WW:
0.60
NVO:
0.94
WW:
$691.42M
NVO:
$327.80B
WW:
$496.30M
NVO:
$268.30B
WW:
$1.30B
NVO:
$181.54B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WW vs. NVO — Risk / Return Rank
WW
NVO
WW vs. NVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WW International, Inc. (WW) and Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WW | NVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.58 | -0.74 | +1.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 273.39 | -0.85 | +274.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 32.58 | 0.88 | +31.71 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 104.29 | -0.68 | +104.97 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 177.17 | -1.01 | +178.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WW | NVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 | -0.74 | +1.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 | 0.10 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.00 | 0.20 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.00 | 0.47 | -0.47 |
Drawdowns
WW vs. NVO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WW drawdown since its inception was -99.87%, which is greater than NVO's maximum drawdown of -74.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WW and NVO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WW | NVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.87% | -74.70% | -25.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -79.68% | -55.03% | -24.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -99.02% | -74.70% | -24.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.68% | -74.70% | -24.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.87% | -74.70% | -25.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -84.50% | -68.81% | -15.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.35% | -17.75% | -33.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 46.91% | 36.77% | +10.14% |
Volatility
WW vs. NVO - Volatility Comparison
WW International, Inc. (WW) has a higher volatility of 45.47% compared to Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO) at 7.70%. This indicates that WW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WW | NVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 45.47% | 7.70% | +37.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 72.26% | 37.81% | +34.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16,706.77% | 51.76% | +16,655.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7,233.54% | 38.20% | +7,195.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5,078.84% | 32.49% | +5,046.35% |
Dividends
WW vs. NVO - Dividend Comparison
WW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVO Novo Nordisk A/S | 4.20% | 3.31% | 1.68% | 1.00% | 1.20% | 1.35% | 1.87% | 2.14% | 1.45% | 1.52% | 2.87% | 0.92% |
WW WW International, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
WW vs. NVO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between WW International, Inc. and Novo Nordisk A/S. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WW vs. NVO - Profitability Comparison
WW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WW International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 118.67M and revenue of 167.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.9%.
NVO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Novo Nordisk A/S reported a gross profit of 83.23B and revenue of 96.82B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.0%.
WW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WW International, Inc. reported an operating income of 62.50M and revenue of 167.36M, resulting in an operating margin of 37.3%.
NVO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Novo Nordisk A/S reported an operating income of 59.62B and revenue of 96.82B, resulting in an operating margin of 61.6%.
WW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WW International, Inc. reported a net income of -52.00M and revenue of 167.36M, resulting in a net margin of -31.1%.
NVO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Novo Nordisk A/S reported a net income of 48.56B and revenue of 96.82B, resulting in a net margin of 50.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WW and NVO have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WW has higher volatility (45.47%) compared to NVO (7.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WW dropped -99.87% vs NVO's -74.70%.
WW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.58 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WW and NVO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer