PortfoliosLab logo
WTRG vs. GWRS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between WTRG and GWRS is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

WTRG vs. GWRS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Essential Utilities, Inc. (WTRG) and Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

WTRG:

0.09

GWRS:

-0.69

Sortino Ratio

WTRG:

0.33

GWRS:

-0.76

Omega Ratio

WTRG:

1.04

GWRS:

0.91

Calmar Ratio

WTRG:

0.08

GWRS:

-0.37

Martin Ratio

WTRG:

0.36

GWRS:

-1.39

Ulcer Index

WTRG:

6.98%

GWRS:

12.61%

Daily Std Dev

WTRG:

22.78%

GWRS:

27.89%

Max Drawdown

WTRG:

-47.95%

GWRS:

-51.67%

Current Drawdown

WTRG:

-19.65%

GWRS:

-44.40%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WTRG:

$10.89B

GWRS:

$285.99M

EPS

WTRG:

$2.27

GWRS:

$0.23

PE Ratio

WTRG:

17.12

GWRS:

45.30

PEG Ratio

WTRG:

4.56

GWRS:

2.89

PS Ratio

WTRG:

4.83

GWRS:

5.34

PB Ratio

WTRG:

1.66

GWRS:

3.70

Total Revenue (TTM)

WTRG:

$2.26B

GWRS:

$53.54M

Gross Profit (TTM)

WTRG:

$1.34B

GWRS:

$27.64M

EBITDA (TTM)

WTRG:

$1.27B

GWRS:

$22.63M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTRG achieves a 8.90% return, which is significantly higher than GWRS's -8.35% return.


WTRG

YTD

8.90%

1M

-3.31%

6M

2.47%

1Y

1.37%

5Y*

1.58%

10Y*

6.50%

GWRS

YTD

-8.35%

1M

2.71%

6M

-16.12%

1Y

-18.98%

5Y*

0.81%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

WTRG vs. GWRS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTRG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WTRG is 5151
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WTRG is 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WTRG is 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WTRG is 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WTRG is 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WTRG is 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

GWRS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GWRS is 1717
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GWRS is 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GWRS is 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GWRS is 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GWRS is 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GWRS is 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

WTRG vs. GWRS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Essential Utilities, Inc. (WTRG) and Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current WTRG Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is higher than the GWRS Sharpe Ratio of -0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTRG and GWRS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

WTRG vs. GWRS - Dividend Comparison

WTRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, more than GWRS's 2.88% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
WTRG
Essential Utilities, Inc.
3.36%3.49%3.18%2.33%1.93%2.05%1.93%2.48%2.02%2.46%2.30%2.37%
GWRS
Global Water Resources, Inc.
2.88%2.61%2.29%2.26%1.69%2.00%2.19%2.84%2.97%1.90%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

WTRG vs. GWRS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTRG drawdown since its inception was -47.95%, smaller than the maximum GWRS drawdown of -51.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTRG and GWRS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

WTRG vs. GWRS - Volatility Comparison

Essential Utilities, Inc. (WTRG) has a higher volatility of 8.12% compared to Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS) at 6.35%. This indicates that WTRG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GWRS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

WTRG vs. GWRS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Essential Utilities, Inc. and Global Water Resources, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20212022202320242025
783.63M
12.46M
(WTRG) Total Revenue
(GWRS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items