PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WTMF vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WTMF vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTMF achieves a 8.50% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 19.01% return. Over the past 10 years, WTMF has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 3.26%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.77% annualized return.


WTMF

1D
-0.02%
1M
1.05%
YTD
8.50%
6M
8.44%
1Y
22.55%
3Y*
9.77%
5Y*
6.17%
10Y*
3.26%

SCHD

1D
0.00%
1M
2.70%
YTD
19.01%
6M
18.63%
1Y
27.16%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
8.36%
10Y*
12.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTMF vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WTMF
WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund
8.50%12.17%3.20%16.72%-6.52%9.48%0.48%-2.75%0.24%-3.40%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
19.01%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between WTMF and SCHD is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011

0.10

Over the past year, WTMF and SCHD have become more correlated (0.33) than their long-term average of 0.10, meaning their price movements have been converging.

WTMF vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WTMF
SCHD

Industrials

17.7%
7.5%

Technology

17.0%
16.4%

Healthcare

16.5%
18.8%

Financial Services

15.8%
9.3%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
6.3%

Real Estate

6.1%

-

Energy

6.1%
16.2%

Basic Materials

4.8%
1.2%

Utilities

2.9%
0.0%

Communication Services

2.4%
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
19.2%

Industrials

WTMF
17.7%
SCHD
7.5%

Technology

WTMF
17.0%
SCHD
16.4%

Healthcare

WTMF
16.5%
SCHD
18.8%

Financial Services

WTMF
15.8%
SCHD
9.3%

Consumer Cyclical

WTMF
8.4%
SCHD
6.3%

Real Estate

WTMF
6.1%
SCHD

-

Energy

WTMF
6.1%
SCHD
16.2%

Basic Materials

WTMF
4.8%
SCHD
1.2%

Utilities

WTMF
2.9%
SCHD
0.0%

Communication Services

WTMF
2.4%
SCHD
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

WTMF
2.4%
SCHD
19.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WTMF vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTMF
WTMF Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
WTMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTMF Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
WTMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTMF Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTMF vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WTMFSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.45

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.61

5.91

-0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.08

14.53

+10.55

WTMF vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTMF Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is comparable to the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTMF and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WTMFSCHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

2.49

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.58

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.77

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.86

-0.71

Drawdowns

WTMF vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTMF drawdown since its inception was -30.79%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTMF and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WTMFSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.79%

-33.37%

+2.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.04%

-4.61%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.93%

-16.13%

+6.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.21%

-16.85%

+3.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.99%

-33.37%

+17.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-1.40%

+1.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.71%

-3.32%

-14.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

1.88%

-0.98%

Volatility

WTMF vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF) is 1.61%, while Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a volatility of 2.66%. This indicates that WTMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WTMFSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.61%

2.66%

-1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.84%

7.66%

-0.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.63%

10.96%

-2.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.46%

14.38%

-4.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.07%

16.72%

-8.65%

WTMF vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTMF has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

WTMF vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

WTMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, less than SCHD's 3.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.26%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%
WTMF
WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund
2.80%3.04%3.57%4.74%5.29%14.71%0.47%1.63%3.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WTMF and SCHD have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHD has higher volatility (2.66%) compared to WTMF (1.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTMF dropped -30.79% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.77% vs 3.26% for WTMF. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, WTMF has been the lower-risk option at 1.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.77% return vs 3.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for WTMF.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 2.80% for WTMF.

WTMF is categorized as Hedge Fund, while SCHD is Dividend. WTMF tracks WisdomTree Managed Futures Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for WTMF and 0.06% for SCHD.

WTMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WTMF and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer