WTMF vs. ERTH
Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF) and Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH).
WTMF and ERTH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WTMF is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the WisdomTree Managed Futures Index. It was launched on Jan 5, 2011. ERTH is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the MSCI Global Environment Select Index. It was launched on Oct 24, 2006. Both WTMF and ERTH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: WTMF or ERTH.
Performance
WTMF vs. ERTH - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WTMF achieves a 3.05% return, which is significantly higher than ERTH's -12.45% return. Over the past 10 years, WTMF has underperformed ERTH with an annualized return of 1.04%, while ERTH has yielded a comparatively higher 5.71% annualized return.
WTMF
3.05%
0.95%
-2.19%
6.22%
4.59%
1.04%
ERTH
-12.45%
-4.25%
-1.96%
-2.88%
0.81%
5.71%
Key characteristics
| WTMF | ERTH | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.83 | -0.17 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.25 | -0.10 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.14 | 0.99 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.49 | -0.08 |
| Martin Ratio | 2.00 | -0.32 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.26% | 10.83% |
| Daily Std Dev | 7.85% | 20.55% |
| Max Drawdown | -30.78% | -64.46% |
| Current Drawdown | -7.79% | -42.40% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WTMF vs. ERTH - Expense Ratio Comparison
WTMF has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ERTH's 0.55% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between WTMF and ERTH is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
WTMF vs. ERTH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF) and Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
WTMF vs. ERTH - Dividend Comparison
WTMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, more than ERTH's 1.24% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WTMF WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 3.27% | 4.74% | 5.29% | 14.71% | 0.47% | 1.63% | 3.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ERTH Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF | 1.24% | 1.28% | 1.22% | 15.33% | 0.21% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.87% | 1.06% | 0.79% | 0.83% | 0.85% |
Drawdowns
WTMF vs. ERTH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WTMF drawdown since its inception was -30.78%, smaller than the maximum ERTH drawdown of -64.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTMF and ERTH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
WTMF vs. ERTH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF) is 3.46%, while Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH) has a volatility of 6.67%. This indicates that WTMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ERTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.