PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
WTMF vs. ERTH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between WTMF and ERTH is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.1

Performance

WTMF vs. ERTH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF) and Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%120.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.27%
99.59%
WTMF
ERTH

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

WTMF:

0.65

ERTH:

-0.02

Sortino Ratio

WTMF:

1.05

ERTH:

0.11

Omega Ratio

WTMF:

1.13

ERTH:

1.01

Calmar Ratio

WTMF:

0.56

ERTH:

-0.01

Martin Ratio

WTMF:

1.83

ERTH:

-0.08

Ulcer Index

WTMF:

3.52%

ERTH:

5.16%

Daily Std Dev

WTMF:

9.92%

ERTH:

19.59%

Max Drawdown

WTMF:

-30.78%

ERTH:

-64.46%

Current Drawdown

WTMF:

-5.83%

ERTH:

-42.49%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTMF achieves a 1.98% return, which is significantly higher than ERTH's 1.11% return. Over the past 10 years, WTMF has underperformed ERTH with an annualized return of 1.21%, while ERTH has yielded a comparatively higher 6.18% annualized return.


WTMF

YTD

1.98%

1M

0.98%

6M

1.66%

1Y

5.93%

5Y*

4.94%

10Y*

1.21%

ERTH

YTD

1.11%

1M

1.64%

6M

-1.36%

1Y

-0.39%

5Y*

-0.95%

10Y*

6.18%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


WTMF vs. ERTH - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTMF has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ERTH's 0.55% expense ratio.


WTMF
WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund
Expense ratio chart for WTMF: current value at 0.65% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.65%
Expense ratio chart for ERTH: current value at 0.55% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.55%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

WTMF vs. ERTH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTMF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WTMF is 2525
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WTMF is 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WTMF is 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WTMF is 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WTMF is 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WTMF is 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

ERTH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ERTH is 77
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ERTH is 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ERTH is 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ERTH is 77
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ERTH is 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ERTH is 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

WTMF vs. ERTH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF) and Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for WTMF, currently valued at 0.65, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.65-0.02
The chart of Sortino ratio for WTMF, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.050.11
The chart of Omega ratio for WTMF, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.131.01
The chart of Calmar ratio for WTMF, currently valued at 0.56, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.56-0.01
The chart of Martin ratio for WTMF, currently valued at 1.83, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.001.83-0.08
WTMF
ERTH

The current WTMF Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is higher than the ERTH Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTMF and ERTH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.65
-0.02
WTMF
ERTH

Dividends

WTMF vs. ERTH - Dividend Comparison

WTMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, more than ERTH's 0.99% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
WTMF
WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund
3.50%3.57%4.74%5.29%14.71%0.47%1.63%3.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ERTH
Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF
0.99%1.00%1.28%1.22%15.33%0.21%0.50%0.61%0.87%1.06%0.79%0.83%

Drawdowns

WTMF vs. ERTH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTMF drawdown since its inception was -30.78%, smaller than the maximum ERTH drawdown of -64.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTMF and ERTH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-5.83%
-42.49%
WTMF
ERTH

Volatility

WTMF vs. ERTH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF) is 3.01%, while Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH) has a volatility of 6.03%. This indicates that WTMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ERTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
3.01%
6.03%
WTMF
ERTH
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab