WTCH.AS vs. FIKHX
WTCH.AS (SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF) and FIKHX (Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z) are both Technology Equities funds. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WTCH.AS charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FIKHX.
Performance
WTCH.AS vs. FIKHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
WTCH.AS is traded in EUR, while FIKHX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FIKHX values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
WTCH.AS
- 1D
- -1.95%
- 1M
- 14.84%
- YTD
- 25.44%
- 6M
- 23.94%
- 1Y
- 48.66%
- 3Y*
- 29.25%
- 5Y*
- 22.49%
- 10Y*
- 23.98%
FIKHX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WTCH.AS vs. FIKHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WTCH.AS SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF | 25.44% | 8.41% | 43.39% | 49.09% | -27.66% | 40.88% | 31.79% | 49.43% | -12.04% |
FIKHX Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z | 0.00% | 12.20% | 44.47% | 55.10% | -31.96% | 37.30% | 50.99% | 54.59% | -17.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between WTCH.AS and FIKHX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2018 | 0.60 |
Over the past year, the correlation between WTCH.AS and FIKHX has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WTCH.AS vs. FIKHX — Risk / Return Rank
WTCH.AS
FIKHX
WTCH.AS vs. FIKHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF (WTCH.AS) and Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z (FIKHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WTCH.AS | FIKHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.10 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WTCH.AS | FIKHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.15 | — | — |
Drawdowns
WTCH.AS vs. FIKHX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WTCH.AS | FIKHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.67% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.46% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.89% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.96% | — | — |
Volatility
WTCH.AS vs. FIKHX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WTCH.AS | FIKHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.02% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.82% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.28% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.45% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.39% | — | — |
WTCH.AS vs. FIKHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WTCH.AS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than FIKHX's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
WTCH.AS vs. FIKHX - Dividend Comparison
WTCH.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FIKHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.85%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIKHX Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z | 9.85% | 9.85% | 7.33% | 3.86% | 3.32% | 11.52% | 7.42% | 2.64% | 22.38% |
WTCH.AS SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WTCH.AS and FIKHX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for WTCH.AS and FIKHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer