PortfoliosLab logo
WSM vs. SCHG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between WSM and SCHG is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.5

Performance

WSM vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

1,000.00%1,500.00%2,000.00%2,500.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
1,733.10%
717.37%
WSM
SCHG

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

WSM:

-0.13

SCHG:

-0.08

Sortino Ratio

WSM:

0.17

SCHG:

0.03

Omega Ratio

WSM:

1.02

SCHG:

1.00

Calmar Ratio

WSM:

-0.19

SCHG:

-0.08

Martin Ratio

WSM:

-0.58

SCHG:

-0.34

Ulcer Index

WSM:

11.89%

SCHG:

5.22%

Daily Std Dev

WSM:

52.28%

SCHG:

21.27%

Max Drawdown

WSM:

-89.01%

SCHG:

-34.59%

Current Drawdown

WSM:

-34.92%

SCHG:

-22.36%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WSM achieves a -23.27% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's -18.93% return. Over the past 10 years, WSM has outperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 16.71%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively lower 13.65% annualized return.


WSM

YTD

-23.27%

1M

-24.80%

6M

-5.83%

1Y

-7.06%

5Y*

47.64%

10Y*

16.71%

SCHG

YTD

-18.93%

1M

-13.67%

6M

-13.06%

1Y

-1.84%

5Y*

17.89%

10Y*

13.65%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

WSM vs. SCHG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WSM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WSM is 4949
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WSM is 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WSM is 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WSM is 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WSM is 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WSM is 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SCHG is 4242
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SCHG is 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SCHG is 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SCHG is 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SCHG is 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SCHG is 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

WSM vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for WSM, currently valued at -0.13, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.00
WSM: -0.13
SCHG: -0.08
The chart of Sortino ratio for WSM, currently valued at 0.17, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
WSM: 0.17
SCHG: 0.03
The chart of Omega ratio for WSM, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
WSM: 1.02
SCHG: 1.00
The chart of Calmar ratio for WSM, currently valued at -0.19, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.00
WSM: -0.19
SCHG: -0.08
The chart of Martin ratio for WSM, currently valued at -0.58, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.00
WSM: -0.58
SCHG: -0.34

The current WSM Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is lower than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WSM and SCHG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.13
-0.08
WSM
SCHG

Dividends

WSM vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

WSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, more than SCHG's 0.50% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
WSM
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
1.61%1.16%1.72%2.65%1.43%1.93%2.55%3.33%2.98%3.02%2.36%1.72%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.50%0.40%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%1.09%

Drawdowns

WSM vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WSM drawdown since its inception was -89.01%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSM and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-34.92%
-22.36%
WSM
SCHG

Volatility

WSM vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) has a higher volatility of 21.41% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 11.13%. This indicates that WSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
21.41%
11.13%
WSM
SCHG