WSM vs. MMM
Compare and contrast key facts about Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) and 3M Company (MMM).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: WSM or MMM.
Correlation
The correlation between WSM and MMM is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
WSM vs. MMM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
WSM:
0.14
MMM:
1.43
WSM:
0.61
MMM:
2.61
WSM:
1.08
MMM:
1.35
WSM:
0.21
MMM:
1.11
WSM:
0.55
MMM:
9.62
WSM:
14.11%
MMM:
5.30%
WSM:
54.89%
MMM:
35.79%
WSM:
-89.01%
MMM:
-59.10%
WSM:
-30.22%
MMM:
-17.12%
Fundamentals
WSM:
$18.70B
MMM:
$74.74B
WSM:
$8.80
MMM:
$8.03
WSM:
17.20
MMM:
17.30
WSM:
1.95
MMM:
3.09
WSM:
2.42
MMM:
3.05
WSM:
8.41
MMM:
16.40
WSM:
$7.71B
MMM:
$24.51B
WSM:
$3.64B
MMM:
$10.04B
WSM:
$1.69B
MMM:
$5.92B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WSM achieves a -17.73% return, which is significantly lower than MMM's 6.90% return. Over the past 10 years, WSM has outperformed MMM with an annualized return of 17.83%, while MMM has yielded a comparatively lower 3.80% annualized return.
WSM
-17.73%
-8.13%
13.06%
9.03%
42.04%
17.83%
MMM
6.90%
-10.06%
11.21%
53.65%
6.39%
3.80%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
WSM vs. MMM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
WSM
MMM
WSM vs. MMM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) and 3M Company (MMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
WSM vs. MMM - Dividend Comparison
WSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, less than MMM's 2.06% yield.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 1.57% | 1.16% | 1.72% | 2.65% | 1.43% | 1.93% | 2.55% | 3.33% | 2.98% | 3.02% | 2.36% | 1.72% |
MMM 3M Company | 2.06% | 2.60% | 5.49% | 4.97% | 3.33% | 3.36% | 3.26% | 2.86% | 2.00% | 2.49% | 2.72% | 2.08% |
Drawdowns
WSM vs. MMM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WSM drawdown since its inception was -89.01%, which is greater than MMM's maximum drawdown of -59.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSM and MMM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
WSM vs. MMM - Volatility Comparison
Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) has a higher volatility of 25.36% compared to 3M Company (MMM) at 18.30%. This indicates that WSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
WSM vs. MMM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Williams-Sonoma, Inc. and 3M Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities