WSM vs. LMT
Compare and contrast key facts about Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: WSM or LMT.
Correlation
The correlation between WSM and LMT is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
WSM vs. LMT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
WSM:
2.00
LMT:
0.59
WSM:
2.88
LMT:
0.91
WSM:
1.39
LMT:
1.13
WSM:
4.92
LMT:
0.43
WSM:
10.86
LMT:
1.22
WSM:
9.46%
LMT:
8.40%
WSM:
51.46%
LMT:
17.45%
WSM:
-89.01%
LMT:
-70.23%
WSM:
0.00%
LMT:
-19.72%
Fundamentals
WSM:
$24.44B
LMT:
$116.22B
WSM:
$8.46
LMT:
$27.85
WSM:
23.47
LMT:
17.61
WSM:
2.41
LMT:
3.98
WSM:
$7.53B
LMT:
$52.42B
WSM:
$3.52B
LMT:
$6.33B
WSM:
$1.57B
LMT:
$7.57B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WSM achieves a 9.85% return, which is significantly higher than LMT's 0.90% return. Over the past 10 years, WSM has outperformed LMT with an annualized return of 21.12%, while LMT has yielded a comparatively lower 12.62% annualized return.
WSM
9.85%
9.32%
39.05%
98.98%
42.78%
21.12%
LMT
0.90%
1.53%
4.47%
9.49%
5.67%
12.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
WSM vs. LMT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
WSM
LMT
WSM vs. LMT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
WSM vs. LMT - Dividend Comparison
WSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than LMT's 2.60% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 1.12% | 1.16% | 1.72% | 2.65% | 1.43% | 1.93% | 2.55% | 3.33% | 2.98% | 3.02% | 2.36% | 1.72% |
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation | 2.60% | 2.62% | 2.68% | 2.34% | 2.98% | 2.76% | 2.31% | 3.13% | 2.32% | 2.71% | 2.83% | 2.85% |
Drawdowns
WSM vs. LMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WSM drawdown since its inception was -89.01%, which is greater than LMT's maximum drawdown of -70.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSM and LMT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
WSM vs. LMT - Volatility Comparison
Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) has a higher volatility of 10.92% compared to Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) at 5.89%. This indicates that WSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
WSM vs. LMT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Williams-Sonoma, Inc. and Lockheed Martin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities