PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
WSM vs. LMT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


WSMLMT
YTD Return51.45%37.89%
1Y Return88.01%42.68%
3Y Return (Ann)20.96%22.09%
5Y Return (Ann)37.35%13.51%
10Y Return (Ann)19.87%16.41%
Sharpe Ratio2.062.94
Sortino Ratio2.644.40
Omega Ratio1.361.57
Calmar Ratio2.822.89
Martin Ratio11.1313.87
Ulcer Index8.03%3.09%
Daily Std Dev43.34%14.61%
Max Drawdown-89.01%-70.23%
Current Drawdown-7.04%0.00%

Fundamentals


WSMLMT
Market Cap$19.07B$146.07B
EPS$8.32$27.53
PE Ratio18.1422.26
PEG Ratio2.185.20
Total Revenue (TTM)$7.58B$54.19B
Gross Profit (TTM)$3.50B$6.51B
EBITDA (TTM)$1.62B$7.74B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between WSM and LMT is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

WSM vs. LMT - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, WSM achieves a 51.45% return, which is significantly higher than LMT's 37.89% return. Over the past 10 years, WSM has outperformed LMT with an annualized return of 19.87%, while LMT has yielded a comparatively lower 16.41% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
7.82%
36.04%
WSM
LMT

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

WSM vs. LMT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WSM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for WSM, currently valued at 2.06, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.06
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for WSM, currently valued at 2.64, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.64
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for WSM, currently valued at 1.36, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.36
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for WSM, currently valued at 2.82, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.82
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for WSM, currently valued at 11.13, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.0011.13
LMT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LMT, currently valued at 2.94, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.94
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LMT, currently valued at 4.40, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.004.40
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LMT, currently valued at 1.57, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.57
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LMT, currently valued at 2.89, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.89
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LMT, currently valued at 13.87, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.0013.87

WSM vs. LMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WSM Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the LMT Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WSM and LMT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.005.00MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
2.06
2.94
WSM
LMT

Dividends

WSM vs. LMT - Dividend Comparison

WSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, less than LMT's 2.06% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
WSM
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
1.35%1.72%2.65%1.43%1.93%2.55%3.33%2.98%3.02%2.36%1.72%1.97%
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
2.06%2.68%2.34%2.98%2.76%2.31%3.13%2.32%2.71%2.83%2.85%3.22%

Drawdowns

WSM vs. LMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WSM drawdown since its inception was -89.01%, which is greater than LMT's maximum drawdown of -70.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSM and LMT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
-7.04%
0
WSM
LMT

Volatility

WSM vs. LMT - Volatility Comparison

Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) has a higher volatility of 7.98% compared to Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) at 4.82%. This indicates that WSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
7.98%
4.82%
WSM
LMT

Financials

WSM vs. LMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Williams-Sonoma, Inc. and Lockheed Martin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items