WRB vs. SMH
Compare and contrast key facts about W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH).
SMH is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2011.
Performance
WRB vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WRB vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WRB W. R. Berkley Corporation | -6.78% | 23.02% | 27.19% | 0.25% | 33.92% | 27.39% | -3.14% | 43.80% | 5.96% | 10.21% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 8.84% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WRB achieves a -6.78% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 8.84% return. Over the past 10 years, WRB has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 17.16%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 31.58% annualized return.
WRB
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- -10.87%
- YTD
- -6.78%
- 6M
- -11.94%
- 1Y
- -4.59%
- 3Y*
- 19.12%
- 5Y*
- 16.68%
- 10Y*
- 17.16%
SMH
- 1D
- 2.24%
- 1M
- -3.55%
- YTD
- 8.84%
- 6M
- 17.83%
- 1Y
- 85.04%
- 3Y*
- 44.53%
- 5Y*
- 26.15%
- 10Y*
- 31.58%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WRB vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
WRB
SMH
WRB vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WRB | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | 2.32 | -2.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | 2.92 | -3.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.41 | -0.43 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.35 | 5.39 | -5.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.80 | 19.22 | -20.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WRB | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.21 | 2.32 | -2.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.76 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.98 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.28 | +0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between WRB and SMH is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
WRB vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
WRB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, more than SMH's 0.28% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WRB W. R. Berkley Corporation | 2.85% | 2.64% | 2.39% | 2.73% | 1.22% | 2.44% | 0.71% | 2.43% | 2.83% | 2.16% | 2.27% | 0.86% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.28% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Drawdowns
WRB vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WRB drawdown since its inception was -69.33%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRB and SMH.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WRB | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.33% | -84.96% | +15.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.39% | -15.95% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.29% | -45.30% | +19.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.35% | -45.30% | -0.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.36% | -8.02% | -7.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.58% | -41.35% | +26.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.23% | 4.47% | +2.76% |
Volatility
WRB vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) is 5.95%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 11.74%. This indicates that WRB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WRB | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.95% | 11.74% | -5.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.46% | 24.02% | -7.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.20% | 36.88% | -14.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.59% | 34.68% | -12.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.43% | 32.29% | -7.86% |