WPM vs. SSLN.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM) and iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L).
SSLN.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Silver. It was launched on Apr 8, 2011.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: WPM or SSLN.L.
Key characteristics
| WPM | SSLN.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 22.01% | 28.53% |
| 1Y Return | 39.40% | 32.52% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 11.76% | 8.34% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 19.26% | 12.42% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 13.02% | 8.81% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.36 | 1.06 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.88 | 1.60 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.24 | 1.19 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.50 | 0.67 |
| Martin Ratio | 5.85 | 3.66 |
| Ulcer Index | 6.93% | 8.08% |
| Daily Std Dev | 29.71% | 27.92% |
| Max Drawdown | -86.74% | -69.95% |
| Current Drawdown | -12.90% | -22.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between WPM and SSLN.L is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
WPM vs. SSLN.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, WPM achieves a 22.01% return, which is significantly lower than SSLN.L's 28.53% return. Over the past 10 years, WPM has outperformed SSLN.L with an annualized return of 13.02%, while SSLN.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.81% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
WPM vs. SSLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM) and iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
WPM vs. SSLN.L - Dividend Comparison
WPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, while SSLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WPM Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. | 1.03% | 1.22% | 1.54% | 1.33% | 1.01% | 1.21% | 1.84% | 1.49% | 1.09% | 1.61% | 1.28% | 2.23% |
SSLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
WPM vs. SSLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WPM drawdown since its inception was -86.74%, which is greater than SSLN.L's maximum drawdown of -69.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WPM and SSLN.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
WPM vs. SSLN.L - Volatility Comparison
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM) has a higher volatility of 11.18% compared to iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) at 9.89%. This indicates that WPM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.