WOLF vs. COST
Compare and contrast key facts about Wolfspeed, Inc. (WOLF) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST).
Performance
WOLF vs. COST - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WOLF vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WOLF Wolfspeed, Inc. | -5.51% | -21.22% |
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 15.72% | -5.81% |
Fundamentals
WOLF:
-$11.51
COST:
$25.63
WOLF:
3.34
COST:
1.16
WOLF:
$747.70M
COST:
$286.27B
WOLF:
-$203.60M
COST:
$19.33B
WOLF:
-$1.31B
COST:
$12.73B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WOLF achieves a -5.51% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 15.72% return.
WOLF
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- -22.44%
- YTD
- -5.51%
- 6M
- -33.75%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COST
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -0.62%
- YTD
- 15.72%
- 6M
- 8.94%
- 1Y
- 4.99%
- 3Y*
- 27.83%
- 5Y*
- 24.29%
- 10Y*
- 22.28%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WOLF vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank
WOLF
COST
WOLF vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wolfspeed, Inc. (WOLF) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WOLF | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.42 | 0.59 | -1.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between WOLF and COST is -0.04. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
WOLF vs. COST - Dividend Comparison
WOLF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WOLF Wolfspeed, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 0.52% | 0.59% | 0.49% | 2.87% | 0.76% | 0.54% | 3.38% | 0.86% | 1.08% | 4.81% | 1.09% | 4.06% |
Drawdowns
WOLF vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WOLF drawdown since its inception was -58.22%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WOLF and COST.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WOLF | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.22% | -53.39% | -4.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -19.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.56% | -6.95% | -46.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.96% | -13.40% | -27.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 9.67% | — |
Volatility
WOLF vs. COST - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WOLF | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.38% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.33% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 105.08% | 20.08% | +85.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 105.08% | 22.51% | +82.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 105.08% | 21.90% | +83.18% |
Financials
WOLF vs. COST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Wolfspeed, Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WOLF vs. COST - Profitability Comparison
WOLF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Wolfspeed, Inc. reported a gross profit of -78.30M and revenue of 168.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -46.5%.
COST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a gross profit of -8.80B and revenue of 69.60B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -12.6%.
WOLF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Wolfspeed, Inc. reported an operating income of -132.60M and revenue of 168.50M, resulting in an operating margin of -78.7%.
COST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported an operating income of 2.61B and revenue of 69.60B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.7%.
WOLF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Wolfspeed, Inc. reported a net income of -150.60M and revenue of 168.50M, resulting in a net margin of -89.4%.
COST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a net income of 2.04B and revenue of 69.60B, resulting in a net margin of 2.9%.