WM vs. PG
Compare and contrast key facts about Waste Management, Inc. (WM) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: WM or PG.
Correlation
The correlation between WM and PG is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
WM vs. PG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
WM:
1.01
PG:
0.66
WM:
1.42
PG:
1.00
WM:
1.22
PG:
1.13
WM:
1.54
PG:
0.86
WM:
3.60
PG:
2.87
WM:
5.09%
PG:
3.54%
WM:
18.11%
PG:
15.33%
WM:
-77.85%
PG:
-54.23%
WM:
-7.02%
PG:
-10.33%
Fundamentals
WM:
$84.97B
PG:
$379.47B
WM:
$6.56
PG:
$5.80
WM:
32.27
PG:
27.78
WM:
2.26
PG:
3.39
WM:
$16.17B
PG:
$62.46B
WM:
$5.28B
PG:
$31.84B
WM:
$4.86B
PG:
$16.49B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WM achieves a 4.92% return, which is significantly higher than PG's -3.89% return. Over the past 10 years, WM has outperformed PG with an annualized return of 17.24%, while PG has yielded a comparatively lower 8.89% annualized return.
WM
4.92%
3.06%
-4.31%
17.02%
14.00%
17.24%
PG
-3.89%
-4.70%
-3.50%
10.78%
7.62%
8.89%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
WM vs. PG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
WM
PG
WM vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Waste Management, Inc. (WM) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
WM vs. PG - Dividend Comparison
WM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than PG's 1.87% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WM Waste Management, Inc. | 1.42% | 1.49% | 1.56% | 1.66% | 1.38% | 1.85% | 1.80% | 2.09% | 1.97% | 2.31% | 2.89% | 2.92% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 1.87% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.32% | 2.78% |
Drawdowns
WM vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WM drawdown since its inception was -77.85%, which is greater than PG's maximum drawdown of -54.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WM and PG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
WM vs. PG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Waste Management, Inc. (WM) is 3.76%, while The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) has a volatility of 4.31%. This indicates that WM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
WM vs. PG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Waste Management, Inc. and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities