WLDSW vs. GOOG
WLDSW (Wearable Devices Ltd.) and GOOG (Alphabet Inc) are both stocks. WLDSW operates in Consumer Electronics (Technology), while GOOG operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past 3 years, WLDSW returned -29.30%/yr vs 39.73%/yr for GOOG. Their -0.00 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past.
Performance
WLDSW vs. GOOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WLDSW achieves a 210.61% return, which is significantly higher than GOOG's 13.80% return.
WLDSW
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -33.76%
- 6M
- 269.37%
- YTD
- 210.61%
- 1Y
- 192.86%
- 3Y*
- -29.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -39.58%
GOOG
- 1D
- 6.88%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- 6M
- 5.49%
- YTD
- 13.80%
- 1Y
- 88.30%
- 3Y*
- 39.73%
- 5Y*
- 21.62%
- 10Y*
- 25.03%
- ALL TIME*
- 22.84%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
GOOG Alphabet Inc | $7.78B | $6.87B | $7.98B |
| $1.28K | $776.01 | $9.36K |
WLDSW vs. GOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WLDSW Wearable Devices Ltd. | 210.61% | -21.89% | -69.82% | -42.24% | -66.52% |
GOOG Alphabet Inc | 13.80% | 65.42% | 35.62% | 58.83% | -20.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between WLDSW and GOOG is -0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2022 | -0.00 |
Fundamentals
WLDSW:
$1.89M
GOOG:
$4.32T
WLDSW:
-$53.26
GOOG:
$19.94
WLDSW:
3.16
GOOG:
9.79
WLDSW:
0.20
GOOG:
7.05
WLDSW:
$1.17M
GOOG:
$445.93B
WLDSW:
-$126.00K
GOOG:
$271.59B
WLDSW:
-$15.96M
GOOG:
$325.74B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WLDSW vs. GOOG — Risk / Return Rank
WLDSW
GOOG
WLDSW vs. GOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wearable Devices Ltd. (WLDSW) and Alphabet Inc (GOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WLDSW | GOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.46 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 4.14 | -1.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.55 | 11.53 | -7.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WLDSW vs. GOOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WLDSW drawdown since its inception was -98.44%, which is greater than GOOG's maximum drawdown of -44.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLDSW and GOOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WLDSW | GOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.44% | -44.60% | -53.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -80.66% | -20.75% | -59.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -96.28% | -29.35% | -66.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -44.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -85.84% | -10.57% | -75.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -80.51% | -8.93% | -71.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 54.86% | 7.44% | +47.42% |
Volatility
WLDSW vs. GOOG - Volatility Comparison
Wearable Devices Ltd. (WLDSW) has a higher volatility of 60.39% compared to Alphabet Inc (GOOG) at 13.08%. This indicates that WLDSW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WLDSW | GOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 60.39% | 13.08% | +47.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 180.97% | 24.59% | +156.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 288.92% | 31.77% | +257.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 340.08% | 31.80% | +308.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 340.08% | 29.34% | +310.74% |
Dividends
WLDSW vs. GOOG - Dividend Comparison
WLDSW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GOOG Alphabet Inc | 0.24% | 0.26% | 0.32% |
WLDSW Wearable Devices Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
WLDSW vs. GOOG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Wearable Devices Ltd. and Alphabet Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
WLDSW and GOOG have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WLDSW has higher volatility (60.39%) compared to GOOG (13.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WLDSW dropped -98.44% vs GOOG's -44.60%.
GOOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WLDSW and GOOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer