WLDS.L vs. ACWI
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WLDS.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI).
WLDS.L and ACWI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WLDS.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World Small Cap Inde. It was launched on Mar 27, 2018. ACWI is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI All Country World Index. It was launched on Mar 26, 2008. Both WLDS.L and ACWI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: WLDS.L or ACWI.
Key characteristics
| WLDS.L | ACWI | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 3.81% | 8.93% |
| 1Y Return | 15.07% | 22.45% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 4.27% | 5.72% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 7.88% | 10.96% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.49 | 2.03 |
| Daily Std Dev | 31.84% | 11.46% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.26% | -56.00% |
| Current Drawdown | -7.39% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between WLDS.L and ACWI is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
WLDS.L vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, WLDS.L achieves a 3.81% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's 8.93% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WLDS.L vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison
WLDS.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
WLDS.L vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WLDS.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
WLDS.L vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison
WLDS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WLDS.L iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 1.73% | 1.88% | 1.79% | 1.71% | 1.43% | 2.33% | 2.25% | 1.94% | 2.19% | 2.56% | 2.26% | 1.89% |
Drawdowns
WLDS.L vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WLDS.L drawdown since its inception was -33.26%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLDS.L and ACWI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
WLDS.L vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WLDS.L) has a higher volatility of 4.26% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) at 3.24%. This indicates that WLDS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.