WLDR vs. GABF

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

WLDR (Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF) and GABF (Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WLDR is a Global Equities fund tracking the Thomson Reuters StarMine Affinity World Leaders Index, while GABF is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Gabelli. WLDR is passively managed, while GABF is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, WLDR returned 29.21%/yr vs 20.10%/yr for GABF. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WLDR charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GABF.

Performance

WLDR vs. GABF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WLDR achieves a 27.97% return, which is significantly higher than GABF's -2.34% return.

WLDR

• 1D: -1.39%
• 1M: -1.46%
• 6M: 23.30%
• YTD: 27.97%
• 1Y: 48.86%
• 3Y*: 29.21%
• 5Y*: 18.29%
• 10Y*: —

GABF

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 1.32%
• 6M: -5.40%
• YTD: -2.34%
• 1Y: -4.10%
• 3Y*: 20.10%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WLDR vs. GABF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
WLDR Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF	27.97%	31.24%	22.74%	18.93%	0.34%
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF	-2.34%	3.60%	44.38%	38.92%	-0.04%

Correlation

The correlation between WLDR and GABF is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2022	0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between WLDR and GABF has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

WLDR vs. GABF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WLDR	GABF
Technology	37.0%	5.2%
Financial Services	12.2%	85.6%
Communication Services	10.1%	-
Industrials	8.1%	4.9%
Healthcare	8.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	7.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	5.9%	-
Energy	3.8%	-
Basic Materials	3.1%	-
Utilities	2.4%	-
Real Estate	1.6%	4.3%

Return for Risk

WLDR vs. GABF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WLDR

WLDR Risk / Return Rank: 94
WLDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
WLDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
WLDR Omega Ratio Rank: 92
WLDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
WLDR Martin Ratio Rank: 94

GABF

GABF Risk / Return Rank: 7
GABF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
GABF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
GABF Omega Ratio Rank: 7
GABF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
GABF Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WLDR vs. GABF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WLDR	GABF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.89	-0.23	+3.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.84	-0.20	+4.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	0.98	+0.51
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.54	-0.24	+5.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.71	-0.53	+21.24

WLDR vs. GABF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WLDR Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is higher than the GABF Sharpe Ratio of -0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WLDR and GABF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WLDR vs. GABF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WLDR drawdown since its inception was -44.69%, which is greater than GABF's maximum drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLDR and GABF.

Drawdown Indicators

	WLDR	GABF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.69%	-20.86%	-23.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.86%	-17.16%	+8.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.30%	-20.86%	+0.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.77%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.71%	-7.14%	+3.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.55%	-4.94%	-3.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.37%	7.78%	-5.41%

Volatility

WLDR vs. GABF - Volatility Comparison

Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR) has a higher volatility of 7.61% compared to Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF) at 4.51%. This indicates that WLDR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GABF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WLDR	GABF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.61%	4.51%	+3.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.23%	13.37%	+0.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.01%	17.59%	-0.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.54%	20.45%	-2.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.03%	20.45%	+0.58%

WLDR vs. GABF - Expense Ratio Comparison

WLDR has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than GABF's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

WLDR vs. GABF - Dividend Comparison

WLDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.27%, more than GABF's 2.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF	2.01%	1.96%	4.19%	4.95%	1.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WLDR Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF	7.27%	9.01%	13.99%	2.28%	2.10%	7.55%	1.80%	2.48%	2.82%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WLDR and GABF in my portfolio?

WLDR and GABF have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WLDR or GABF?

WLDR has higher volatility (7.61%) compared to GABF (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WLDR dropped -44.69% vs GABF's -20.86%.

Which ETF is better, WLDR or GABF?

On 3-year performance, WLDR leads with 29.21% vs 20.10% for GABF. On fees, GABF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, GABF has been the lower-risk option at 4.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WLDR or GABF?

Over the 3-year period, WLDR has performed better with a 29.21% return vs 20.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WLDR or GABF?

GABF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for WLDR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WLDR or GABF?

WLDR has the higher dividend yield at 7.27%, compared with 2.01% for GABF.

What is the main difference between WLDR and GABF?

WLDR is categorized as Global Equities, while GABF is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Regents Park Funds and Gabelli. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for WLDR and 0.10% for GABF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WLDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.