PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WKHS vs. LCID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WKHS vs. LCID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS) and Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WKHS achieves a -26.92% return, which is significantly higher than LCID's -41.63% return.


WKHS

1D
-0.80%
1M
14.46%
YTD
-26.92%
6M
-61.80%
1Y
-63.53%
3Y*
-88.78%
5Y*
-84.70%
10Y*
-57.78%

LCID

1D
-7.22%
1M
-5.66%
YTD
-41.63%
6M
-52.10%
1Y
-71.95%
3Y*
-54.61%
5Y*
-51.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WKHS vs. LCID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
WKHS
Workhorse Group Inc.
-26.92%-95.14%-90.31%-76.32%-65.14%-77.96%-35.36%
LCID
Lucid Group, Inc.
-41.63%-65.00%-28.27%-38.36%-82.05%280.12%1.21%

Correlation

The correlation between WKHS and LCID is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2020

0.42

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WKHS:

$35.84M

LCID:

$20.26B

EPS

WKHS:

-$5.65

LCID:

-$3.19

PS Ratio

WKHS:

2.29

LCID:

5.81

Total Revenue (TTM)

WKHS:

$18.44M

LCID:

$1.12B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WKHS:

-$19.61M

LCID:

-$1.62B

EBITDA (TTM)

WKHS:

-$49.47M

LCID:

-$3.03B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WKHS vs. LCID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WKHS
WKHS Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
WKHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WKHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
WKHS Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
WKHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
WKHS Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

LCID
LCID Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
LCID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCID Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCID Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
LCID Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCID Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WKHS vs. LCID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS) and Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WKHSLCIDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.47

-0.95

+0.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.22

-2.01

+1.79

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

0.79

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.68

-0.88

+0.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.83

-1.33

+0.50

WKHS vs. LCID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WKHS Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is higher than the LCID Sharpe Ratio of -0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WKHS and LCID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WKHSLCIDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.47

-0.95

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.79

-0.63

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.34

-0.45

+0.10

Drawdowns

WKHS vs. LCID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WKHS drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum LCID drawdown of -99.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WKHS and LCID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WKHSLCIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-99.03%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-95.59%

-82.08%

-13.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.94%

-93.09%

-6.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-100.00%

-98.99%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-100.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-100.00%

-98.94%

-1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-71.94%

-75.99%

+4.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

78.89%

54.40%

+24.49%

Volatility

WKHS vs. LCID - Volatility Comparison

Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS) has a higher volatility of 47.17% compared to Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID) at 17.67%. This indicates that WKHS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WKHSLCIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

47.17%

17.67%

+29.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

70.98%

50.54%

+20.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

135.79%

76.02%

+59.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

107.53%

81.51%

+26.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

125.21%

86.76%

+38.45%

Dividends

WKHS vs. LCID - Dividend Comparison

Neither WKHS nor LCID has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

WKHS vs. LCID - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Workhorse Group Inc. and Lucid Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M20222023202420252026
9.74M
0
(WKHS) Total Revenue
(LCID) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


WKHS and LCID have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WKHS has higher volatility (47.17%) compared to LCID (17.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WKHS dropped -100.00% vs LCID's -99.03%.

WKHS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.47 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WKHS and LCID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer