WIREX vs. FCNTX

In the year-to-date period, WIREX achieves a 2.45% return, which is significantly lower than FCNTX's 6.70% return. Over the past 10 years, WIREX has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 9.47%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.84% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

WIREX has a 1.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wireless Fund (WIREX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current WIREX Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is comparable to the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WIREX and FCNTX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

WIREX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FCNTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.

The maximum WIREX drawdown since its inception was -92.02%, which is greater than FCNTX's maximum drawdown of -48.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WIREX and FCNTX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Wireless Fund (WIREX) has a higher volatility of 7.85% compared to Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX) at 4.25%. This indicates that WIREX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.