PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WIREX vs. FCNTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WIREX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wireless Fund (WIREX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WIREX achieves a 23.94% return, which is significantly higher than FCNTX's 10.97% return. Over the past 10 years, WIREX has outperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 21.54%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively lower 17.96% annualized return.


WIREX

1D
2.80%
1M
3.86%
YTD
23.94%
6M
23.57%
1Y
56.64%
3Y*
34.60%
5Y*
20.81%
10Y*
21.54%

FCNTX

1D
1.24%
1M
4.18%
YTD
10.97%
6M
10.79%
1Y
26.78%
3Y*
27.28%
5Y*
15.45%
10Y*
17.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WIREX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WIREX
Wireless Fund
23.94%26.45%38.24%57.70%-34.76%23.22%41.12%37.03%-4.60%29.76%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
10.97%21.76%36.00%38.67%-28.31%24.52%32.48%30.00%-3.81%32.18%

Correlation

The correlation between WIREX and FCNTX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2000

0.83

The correlation between WIREX and FCNTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WIREX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WIREX
WIREX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
WIREX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WIREX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
WIREX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
WIREX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
WIREX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

FCNTX
FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WIREX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wireless Fund (WIREX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WIREXFCNTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.31

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

2.31

+1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.13

9.69

+1.44

WIREX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WIREX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WIREX and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WIREX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WIREX drawdown since its inception was -92.42%, which is greater than FCNTX's maximum drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WIREX and FCNTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WIREXFCNTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.42%

-49.19%

-43.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.20%

-11.30%

-4.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.74%

-19.75%

-44.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.74%

-32.59%

-32.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.74%

-32.59%

-32.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.47%

-0.48%

-27.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.33%

-8.15%

-50.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.95%

2.69%

+2.26%

Volatility

WIREX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

Wireless Fund (WIREX) has a higher volatility of 10.05% compared to Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) at 5.94%. This indicates that WIREX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WIREXFCNTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.05%

5.94%

+4.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.60%

11.74%

+6.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.84%

14.92%

+7.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.73%

19.30%

+44.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.08%

19.74%

+28.34%

WIREX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WIREX has a 1.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

WIREX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

WIREX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, less than FCNTX's 4.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
4.21%5.21%4.19%3.78%11.87%10.80%8.01%4.16%7.46%6.08%3.81%5.33%
WIREX
Wireless Fund
2.75%3.41%1.95%0.45%6.80%16.58%11.36%21.52%5.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WIREX and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WIREX has higher volatility (10.05%) compared to FCNTX (5.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WIREX dropped -92.42% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

WIREX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WIREX and FCNTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer