PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WIREX vs. FCNTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WIREX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wireless Fund (WIREX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WIREX achieves a 8.62% return, which is significantly higher than FCNTX's 5.62% return. Over the past 10 years, WIREX has outperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 19.11%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively lower 16.85% annualized return.


WIREX

1D
4.18%
1M
-6.71%
6M
7.43%
YTD
8.62%
1Y
23.90%
3Y*
26.45%
5Y*
16.34%
10Y*
19.11%
ALL TIME*
3.54%

FCNTX

1D
0.95%
1M
-3.83%
6M
3.61%
YTD
5.62%
1Y
13.75%
3Y*
22.98%
5Y*
13.11%
10Y*
16.85%
ALL TIME*
13.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

WIREX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WIREX
Wireless Fund
8.62%26.45%38.24%57.70%-34.76%23.22%41.12%37.03%-4.60%29.76%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
5.62%21.76%36.00%38.67%-28.31%24.52%32.48%30.00%-3.81%32.18%

Correlation

The correlation between WIREX and FCNTX is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2000

0.83

The correlation between WIREX and FCNTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WIREX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WIREX
WIREX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
WIREX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WIREX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
WIREX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
WIREX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
WIREX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

FCNTX
FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WIREX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wireless Fund (WIREX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WIREXFCNTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.16

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

1.19

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.72

4.65

-0.93

WIREX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WIREX Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is comparable to the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WIREX and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WIREX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WIREX drawdown since its inception was -92.42%, which is greater than FCNTX's maximum drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WIREX and FCNTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WIREXFCNTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.42%

-49.19%

-43.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.19%

-11.30%

-5.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.74%

-19.75%

-44.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.74%

-32.59%

-32.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.74%

-32.59%

-32.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.31%

-5.29%

-32.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.23%

-8.14%

-50.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.76%

2.89%

+2.87%

Volatility

WIREX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

Wireless Fund (WIREX) has a higher volatility of 9.80% compared to Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) at 3.84%. This indicates that WIREX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WIREXFCNTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.80%

3.84%

+5.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.23%

12.26%

+8.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.37%

15.46%

+9.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.94%

19.37%

+44.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.20%

19.73%

+28.47%

WIREX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WIREX has a 1.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

WIREX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

WIREX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, less than FCNTX's 4.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
4.42%5.21%4.19%3.78%11.87%10.80%8.01%4.16%7.46%6.08%3.81%5.33%
WIREX
Wireless Fund
3.13%3.41%1.95%0.45%6.80%16.58%11.36%21.52%5.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WIREX and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WIREX has higher volatility (9.80%) compared to FCNTX (3.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WIREX dropped -92.42% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

FCNTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WIREX and FCNTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer