PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WING vs. TXRH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WING vs. TXRH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wingstop Inc. (WING) and Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WING achieves a -34.03% return, which is significantly lower than TXRH's 9.24% return. Over the past 10 years, WING has outperformed TXRH with an annualized return of 22.68%, while TXRH has yielded a comparatively lower 16.56% annualized return.


WING

1D
-3.12%
1M
11.63%
YTD
-34.03%
6M
-38.14%
1Y
-54.95%
3Y*
-5.35%
5Y*
1.43%
10Y*
22.68%

TXRH

1D
1.14%
1M
1.67%
YTD
9.24%
6M
4.40%
1Y
-5.30%
3Y*
20.15%
5Y*
16.05%
10Y*
16.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WING vs. TXRH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WING
Wingstop Inc.
-34.03%-15.72%11.06%87.26%-17.05%30.91%60.40%34.99%77.28%32.26%
TXRH
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
9.24%-6.57%49.78%37.15%4.16%15.71%39.83%-3.62%15.11%11.16%

Correlation

The correlation between WING and TXRH is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2015

0.35

The correlation between WING and TXRH shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.41 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WING:

$4.32B

TXRH:

$11.89B

EPS

WING:

$4.02

TXRH:

$6.26

PE Ratio

WING:

39.00

TXRH:

28.72

PEG Ratio

WING:

0.86

TXRH:

1.79

PS Ratio

WING:

6.15

TXRH:

1.97

Total Revenue (TTM)

WING:

$709.48M

TXRH:

$6.06B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WING:

$315.08M

TXRH:

$1.14B

EBITDA (TTM)

WING:

$217.85M

TXRH:

$701.29M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WING vs. TXRH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WING
WING Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
WING Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WING Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
WING Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
WING Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
WING Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

TXRH
TXRH Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
TXRH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TXRH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
TXRH Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
TXRH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
TXRH Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WING vs. TXRH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wingstop Inc. (WING) and Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WINGTXRHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

0.99

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.81

-0.27

-0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.42

-0.50

-0.92

WING vs. TXRH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WING Sharpe Ratio is -0.86, which is lower than the TXRH Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WING and TXRH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WING vs. TXRH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WING drawdown since its inception was -72.06%, smaller than the maximum TXRH drawdown of -76.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WING and TXRH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WINGTXRHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.06%

-76.59%

+4.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-68.36%

-19.61%

-48.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-72.06%

-24.82%

-47.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.06%

-30.45%

-41.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.06%

-58.04%

-14.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-63.10%

-10.00%

-53.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.21%

-16.15%

-1.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.66%

11.07%

+27.59%

Volatility

WING vs. TXRH - Volatility Comparison

Wingstop Inc. (WING) has a higher volatility of 19.17% compared to Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) at 10.08%. This indicates that WING's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TXRH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WINGTXRHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.17%

10.08%

+9.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.90%

22.55%

+24.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.15%

28.93%

+35.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.17%

30.59%

+20.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.32%

35.64%

+10.68%

Dividends

WING vs. TXRH - Dividend Comparison

WING's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than TXRH's 1.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TXRH
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
1.59%1.64%1.35%1.80%2.02%1.34%0.46%2.13%1.68%1.59%1.58%1.90%
WING
Wingstop Inc.
0.77%0.48%0.34%0.32%3.43%0.36%4.15%0.46%5.44%0.36%9.80%0.00%

Financials

WING vs. TXRH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Wingstop Inc. and Texas Roadhouse, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
183.73M
1.63B
(WING) Total Revenue
(TXRH) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

WING vs. TXRH - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Wingstop Inc. and Texas Roadhouse, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%202220232024202520260
30.6%
Portfolio components
WING - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wingstop Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 183.73M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

TXRH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. reported a gross profit of 499.53M and revenue of 1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.6%.

WING - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wingstop Inc. reported an operating income of 50.41M and revenue of 183.73M, resulting in an operating margin of 27.4%.

TXRH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. reported an operating income of 146.34M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.0%.

WING - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wingstop Inc. reported a net income of 29.88M and revenue of 183.73M, resulting in a net margin of 16.3%.

TXRH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. reported a net income of 123.43M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 7.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


WING and TXRH have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WING has higher volatility (19.17%) compared to TXRH (10.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WING dropped -72.06% vs TXRH's -76.59%.

TXRH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.18 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WING and TXRH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer